Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert Make Travis deployment config consistent #415

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 7, 2017

Conversation

gemmaleigh
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does the pull request solve?

This PR attempts to fix deployment to Heroku, which is currently failing.

This reverts the changes made in #404:
#408

It moves the open_ssl command back to before_install, otherwise it runs more than once (as
there is more than one deploy provider).

See related issue here:
travis-ci/travis-ci#2570

What type of change is it?

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Move this back to before_install, otherwise it runs more than once (as
there is more than one deploy provider).

This reverts the changes made in #404:
#408
@gemmaleigh gemmaleigh temporarily deployed to govuk-elements-review-pr-415 March 7, 2017 18:30 Inactive
Copy link
Contributor

@dsingleton dsingleton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, merge when green.

@gemmaleigh gemmaleigh merged commit 5ecac9b into master Mar 7, 2017
@dsingleton dsingleton deleted the revert-travis-amends branch March 8, 2017 08:43
gemmaleigh added a commit to alphagov/govuk_frontend_toolkit that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2017
Moves the open_ssl command back to before_install, otherwise it runs
more than once (as there is more than one deploy provider).

Related Travis issue here:
travis-ci/travis-ci#2570

This behaviour was reverted in GOV.UK elements here:
alphagov/govuk_elements#415

Before deploying, also check that the build has passed successfully.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants