Switch from mamba to conda #858
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Interesting, I am not sure if we were lucky, but we did not get any timeout (see conda/infrastructure#906) now. Perhaps conda is less irritable w.r.t. to mamba on slow downloads, and just waits? Anyhow, I think it make anyhow it make sense to merge this. |
|
(I disabled the changelog as I do not think is changelog-relevant change). |
|
fyi @LoreMoretti |
GiulioRomualdi
approved these changes
Jun 21, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See robotology/robotology-superbuild#1653 for the rationale. In general nowadays
condashould be more and less as fast asmamba, and is more actively maintained.