Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AMP Image loading issue on long form story page. #9397

Closed
gregdevs opened this issue May 17, 2017 · 32 comments
Closed

AMP Image loading issue on long form story page. #9397

gregdevs opened this issue May 17, 2017 · 32 comments

Comments

@gregdevs
Copy link

What's the issue?

AMP Images don't seem to load after the first few hundred pixels from the top of the browser as you scroll a long form story. Reference > https://www.google.com/amp/abcnews.go.com/amp/International/International/deepdive/syrian-refugee-children-photos-this-is-home-42066342

How do we reproduce the issue?

  1. Google search ABC News This is home
  2. Click First link
  3. As you start scrolling past the first couple of divs, images either show as blank, white space or take a very long time to display. It seems the img src value is showing the correct url to the image. The page validates successfully.

Attached screenshots.

step1
step2
step3

@aghassemi
Copy link
Contributor

aghassemi commented May 17, 2017

Some investigations:

1- This only happens if the page is prereneded first via SERP. Refreshing the page or hitting the viewer link directly does not repro the issue.
2- Similar long image pages under same condition do not repro the issue: Search for "top 25 news photos", the Atlantic AMP blue link is prerendered similar to this one but the issue is not producible on that page, there is probably something on that ABC page that triggers the issue.

/to @dvoytenko @jridgewell

@gregdevs
Copy link
Author

gregdevs commented May 17, 2017

Interesting. Ok, i'll continue to dig in and try to find the cause of the issue. Thanks.

@aghassemi
Copy link
Contributor

@gregdevs Still an AMP bug regardless, we are just hitting a race condition on that page that we are not hitting on some similar pages.

@aghassemi
Copy link
Contributor

/cc @rsimha-amp Something to consider for image diffing infrastructure, how one lands on an AMP page (considering SRP, cache transformations, viewer pre-rendering, all play a role) matters on the final rendered result. Ideally we can account for these (or at minimum start with the common case which is SRP + cache + viewer rather than direct canonical link hit)

@jridgewell
Copy link
Contributor

I'm debugging it now. Very close to finding the root cause.

@jridgewell
Copy link
Contributor

The issue is the images think they're wayyyyyyy further down the page (some 10000px more) than they actually are. If I manually request a remeasure on the images, they get their correct positions, and rendering works properly (they're either inViewport or renderOutsideViewport eligible).

This is caused by an <amp-carousel> element with a ton of elements. Particularly, there are:

  1. An <amp-img> which has 0x0 size
  2. A caption, which has implicit height.

This caption element pushes all the images down. By the time the carousel is "attached", its images have already had their first measure. Then the carousel attaches, and causes all it's children to display: none (like it should, it hasn't built yet). And it also set overflow: hidden, which takes this huge list of images/captions and collapses hides them inside the carousel. Now everything beneath the carousel gets moved up. But they never get told to remeasure.

@aghassemi
Copy link
Contributor

Interesting, .i-amphtml-layout-size-defined should have protected against this with its overflow:hidden and applying fixed size before the extension even loads. Is the problem that applyLayout_ is happening too late? I'd have expected no measuring to happen until applyLayout_ is done for all elements.

@jridgewell
Copy link
Contributor

Right, the carousel has not been stubbed yet, so it doesn't have i-amphtml-notbuilt nor .i-amphtml-layout-size-defined yet.

@jridgewell
Copy link
Contributor

This is another that would be fixed by #9279. @dvoytenko I think we should merge it while we work on Layers.

@gregdevs
Copy link
Author

gregdevs commented May 17, 2017

Whoa, interesting. I checked another page that is similar content type without the carousel and yes, the images load as expected. https://www.google.com/amp/abcnews.go.com/amp/US/deepdive/disappearing-beaches-sea-level-rise-39427567

@dvoytenko dvoytenko assigned jridgewell and unassigned dvoytenko May 23, 2017
@dvoytenko
Copy link
Contributor

@jridgewell I'd prefer if at this time we did something like this: remeasure everything once stubbing is done. Again, I don't think the #9279 would really address enough of issues here, b/c this not only affects AMP element's children, but it affects siblings. Actually, it looks like it affects siblings more.

I think we already have a relayout-all signals in resources - we may need to trigger it again.

@adelinamart
Copy link
Contributor

@jridgewell any updates on the comment above? Thanks.

@jridgewell
Copy link
Contributor

This has to wait for Layers to fix.

@cramforce
Copy link
Member

We need a faster fix for this.

Could this be the same issue as #10267. Did this repro in Chrome? Would the workaround for #10267 fix this?

@cramforce
Copy link
Member

Still repros. We need to fix this immediately. I don't see how this can be related to #9279

@jridgewell
Copy link
Contributor

Working on it now. We can do a really dirty fix by requesting remeasures of everything after build/layout. Layers code will do this, though it'll be a bit smarter.

@dvoytenko
Copy link
Contributor

I don't think remeasures after build/layout would work - no guarantee that siblings are fully stubbed correctly. I think we need to figure out a way to estimate completion of stubbing for everything or by groups and request remeasures based on that. We now do something similar for font, but we need to find a way to do it for stubbing as well, unfortunately.

@cramforce
Copy link
Member

Can't we just debounce a remeasure after calling buildCallback?

@dvoytenko
Copy link
Contributor

buildCallback is too late. The right one is applyLayout. And, yes, we can debounce it after each - still a lot of debounces for the initial stage with full remeasure though. But would fix the problem.

@cramforce
Copy link
Member

Was thinking something like debounce over 1 or 2 seconds.

@jridgewell
Copy link
Contributor

buildCallback is too late. The right one is applyLayout.

#buildCallback is called immediately if the document has already been parsed, though. And if it's not parsed, it's likely ok?

@dvoytenko
Copy link
Contributor

With @cramforce 's change, buildCallback has two problems:

  1. It's highly throttled in prerender.
  2. It waits for the script to download. That means that we are missing out on valuable time to remeasure many elements, especially builtins such as images, before something can get the right measures.

I think we just need, for now, to signal resources manager to debounce remeasures some time after this.layout_ = applyLayout_(this);.

cramforce added a commit to cramforce/amphtml that referenced this issue Jul 7, 2017
…ntil build time.

Fixes ampproject#9397

This change is dangerous and might break things, but I think it is the right thing to do.

Children of `layout=responsive` elements should not be allowed to effect the height of the element. This should probably be extended to `fixed-height`.
@cramforce cramforce self-assigned this Jul 7, 2017
@aghassemi
Copy link
Contributor

This newly raised issue: #10300 is related but for layout=fill. The i-amphtml-layout-fill is applied too late for runtime to understand that the item's size is not 0 in the first layout pass. Interestingly if I copy the i-amphtml-layout-fill CSS from core to <style amp-custom> for that page, everything works; so it may not be that i-amphtml-layout-fill class is added too late, but rather might be that "the injected core CSS is not parsed yet by the time layout starts"...

@gregdevs
Copy link
Author

Thanks everyone. Looks like the issue has been resolved. Much appreciated!

@diniscorreia
Copy link

I understand this might have been fixed in the meantime, but just leaving this here: I'm having what I think is the same issue, except this happens with <amp-img> nested on a <amp-list> (and not <amp-carousel>).

It only happens if the page is prereneded.

@jridgewell
Copy link
Contributor

Link?

@diniscorreia
Copy link

@jridgewell https://www.google.pt/amp/s/www.publico.pt/2017/08/01/sociedade/noticia/agencia-do-medicamento-porto-concorre-com-mais-18-cidades-1780977/amp Scroll down to the bottom of the page.

Weirdly, it only fails when clicking from a search results page. It loads when opening the prerendered URL directly.

@jridgewell
Copy link
Contributor

It's not the same issue exactly (the element's cached top offset is correct). I'll look into this to figure it out.

@jridgewell
Copy link
Contributor

@diniscorreia: This was an issue with prerendering in a viewer context, and has been fixed.

@diniscorreia
Copy link

@jridgewell awesome, thanks!

@miladmhp
Copy link

@jridgewell @aghassemi I Have the same issue with AMP image loading, sometimes images loaded for a long time, or even I just have seen a white box instead of the image. And with just resize the page even for 1 px, all images have been load immediately, It seems to need a shock to load images:).
Please help me in solving this, I'm Confused.

@satishsurve
Copy link

satishsurve commented Nov 12, 2019

@jridgewell @aghassemi I have the same issue with AMP images loading. Initial viewport(top 1000px) sections images are loading correctly but when we scroll down page (after some 1000px) not loading AMP images.

As per my observation after AMP page rendering amp-image tag should be converted to like this -
image

but getting AMP image tag like this after top (1000 px) -
image

When we resize the page, AMP images loading correctly.
Please help on this.

Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment