-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 567
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Attestation with a private key #1465
Comments
I have similar issue in my CI environment that has the key stored in the secrets. If needed, I can be available to help |
Hi @TomiOhl and @ReDemoNBR, thanks for catching this. We will have an updated README and a new way to specify a private key in the next release of Syft. Stay tuned--for the time being you can go back to Syft 0.66.0. There's some additional information about the change here: #1442 Hope this helps and sorry for the trouble! |
@TomiOhl I've merged a new change that's unreleased but on the tip of main. Let me know if this is still behaving incorrectly to your expectations. I can also reopen the issue or file a new one if there are other asks surrounding this workflow. Thanks again! |
What happened:
The readme still has the steps using the now removed
--key
flag.Relevant parts:
What you expected to happen:
The readme should be updated to reflect the breaking changes between v0.65.0 and v0.66.0. Trying to run the given command results in the following error:
error during command execution: unknown flag: --key
. I'd appreciate up-to-date steps.Anything else we need to know?:
If the problem is on my side and the readme is correct, let me know and I'll provide more relevant feedback.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: