Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 29, 2024. It is now read-only.

Upgrade to Jasmine 3.3.0 #5054

Closed
Maximaximum opened this issue Nov 23, 2018 · 15 comments
Closed

Upgrade to Jasmine 3.3.0 #5054

Maximaximum opened this issue Nov 23, 2018 · 15 comments

Comments

@Maximaximum
Copy link

Feature Request

It would be great to upgrade to Jasmine 3.3.0.

There's already an issue #4788 and a PR #4842 to upgrade to 3.1.0, but 3.3.0 has some new features including Expectation.withContext() function, which would be a very useful thing for e2e tests.

@cnishina
Copy link
Member

I will look into this. I want to use a matching version of Jasmine supported internally as well.

@cnishina cnishina added the P2 label Nov 29, 2018
cnishina added a commit to cnishina/protractor that referenced this issue Dec 10, 2018
cnishina added a commit to cnishina/protractor that referenced this issue Dec 11, 2018
- version @types/jasmine 3.3 requires a minimum of typescript 2.8

closes angular#5054
cnishina added a commit to cnishina/protractor that referenced this issue Dec 12, 2018
- version @types/jasmine 3.3 requires a minimum of typescript 2.8

closes angular#5054
cnishina added a commit to cnishina/protractor that referenced this issue Dec 12, 2018
- version @types/jasmine 3.3 requires a minimum of typescript 2.8

closes angular#5054
cnishina added a commit to cnishina/protractor that referenced this issue Dec 12, 2018
- version @types/jasmine 3.3 requires a minimum of typescript 2.8

closes angular#5054
cnishina added a commit to cnishina/protractor that referenced this issue Dec 12, 2018
- version @types/jasmine 3.3 requires a minimum of typescript 2.8

closes angular#5054
cnishina added a commit to cnishina/protractor that referenced this issue Dec 13, 2018
- version @types/jasmine 3.3 requires a minimum of typescript 2.8

closes angular#5054
@cnishina
Copy link
Member

Tagging this issue as kinda related: jasmine/jasmine#1522

cnishina added a commit to cnishina/protractor that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2018
- version @types/jasmine 3.3 requires a minimum of typescript 2.8

closes angular#5054
cnishina added a commit to cnishina/protractor that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2018
- version @types/jasmine 3.3 requires a minimum of typescript 2.8

closes angular#5054
cnishina added a commit to cnishina/protractor that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2018
- version @types/jasmine 3.3 requires a minimum of typescript 2.8

closes angular#5054
cnishina added a commit to cnishina/protractor that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2018
- version @types/jasmine 3.3 requires a minimum of typescript 2.8

closes angular#5054
cnishina added a commit to cnishina/protractor that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2018
- version @types/jasmine 3.3 requires a minimum of typescript 2.8

closes angular#5054
cnishina added a commit to cnishina/protractor that referenced this issue Dec 16, 2018
- version @types/jasmine 3.3 requires a minimum of typescript 2.8

closes angular#5054
@cnishina
Copy link
Member

I changed the title of the PR. I think this is the step in the right direction to getting us to 3.3

@cnishina
Copy link
Member

Could this fix #3234 ? I have no idea.... fingers crossed. I have two days and a dream to get this done.

@cnishina
Copy link
Member

Closed with #5102

@Maximaximum
Copy link
Author

Cool, thank you!
Looking forward to the new protractor release supporting Jasmine 3.3.0!

@daniell0gda
Copy link

Thanks! Do you have idea when we can use it ?

@OrangeDog
Copy link

What framework are you supposed to use with this? jasmine3 is not a valid framework.

@cnishina
Copy link
Member

cnishina commented Jun 5, 2019

This PR was to go into the selenium-webdriver 4 upgrade. This is being held back and will be released in coordination with the Angular team. Jasmine 3 I believe is a valid testing framework.

@gsai0205
Copy link

Looking forward to the new protractor release supporting Jasmine 3.3.0!

@danduh
Copy link

danduh commented Nov 17, 2019

Any updates about supporting Jasmine 3.3.0?

@manuman94
Copy link

Any updates?

@FloMaetschke
Copy link

any updates?

1 similar comment
@zhe1ka
Copy link

zhe1ka commented Jun 24, 2021

any updates?

@StanislavKharchenko
Copy link

This depends on the next release of v6-ish.
Related PR #5516

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

10 participants