FEAT: Improve extensions quality

[Samuelopez-ansys]

Description

Add documentation of extensions
Unify UI style

Issue linked

Close #5545

Checklist

• I have tested my changes locally.
• I have added necessary documentation or updated existing documentation.
• I have followed the coding style guidelines of this project.
• I have added appropriate tests (unit, integration, system).
• I have reviewed my changes before submitting this pull request.
• I have linked the issue or issues that are solved by the PR if any.
• I have agreed with the Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

[ansys-reviewer-bot]

Thanks for opening a Pull Request. If you want to perform a review write a comment saying:

@ansys-reviewer-bot review

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 93.75000% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 85.29%. Comparing base (4ab7475) to head (bcaa60a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5549      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.00%   85.29%   +0.28%     
==========================================
  Files         151      151              
  Lines       60761    60753       -8     
==========================================
+ Hits        51652    51820     +168     
+ Misses       9109     8933     -176     

[SMoraisAnsys]

LGTM, thanks for improving the documentation and unifying the extensions. Also, I like the added checks in the workflows !

[Samuelopez-ansys]

I moved it to draft because the same had to be applied to more files, and I am still fixing the other extensions.

I have also uncommented the unit tests that were failing due to PyEDB issues, and now they are passing :) so we can improve the coverage.

[SMoraisAnsys]

I moved it to draft because the same had to be applied to more files, and I am still fixing the other extensions.

I have also uncommented the unit tests that were failing due to PyEDB issues, and now they are passing :) so we can improve the coverage.

I think this problem were related to the dotnet issues that was fixed two weeks ago. I'll add the same changes in PyAEDT.

[gmalinve]

@Samuelopez-ansys first review of the doc (without code review)