Skip to content

Conversation

@amoghrajesh
Copy link
Contributor

Openlineage released 1.34.0:

> openlineage-integration-common==1.34.0
> openlineage-python==1.34.0
> openlineage_sql==1.34.0

This causes a breaking change in OpenLineage 1.34.0 where the DBT processor expects an invocation_id field in the run metadata, but the test data didn't include this field.

Added the invocation_id field to the metadata section of the test run_results.json file and assigned it equal to run_id:

{
  "metadata": {
    "dbt_schema_version": "https://schemas.getdbt.com/dbt/run-results/v4.json",
    "dbt_version": "1.6.1",
    "invocation_id": "188471607"
  }
}

Fixes CI:

______ TestGenerateOpenLineageEventsFromDbtCloudRun.test_generate_events _______
[gw2] linux -- Python 3.9.23 /usr/local/bin/python3
providers/dbt/cloud/tests/unit/dbt/cloud/utils/test_openlineage.py:187: in test_generate_events
    generate_openlineage_events_from_dbt_cloud_run(mock_operator, task_instance=mock_task_instance)
providers/common/compat/src/airflow/providers/common/compat/openlineage/check.py:100: in wrapper
    return func(*args, **kwargs)
providers/dbt/cloud/src/airflow/providers/dbt/cloud/utils/openlineage.py:192: in generate_openlineage_events_from_dbt_cloud_run
    events = processor.parse().events()
/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/openlineage/common/provider/dbt/processor.py:201: in parse
    events += self.parse_execution(context, nodes)
/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/openlineage/common/provider/dbt/processor.py:299: in parse_execution
    self.get_run(run_id),
/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/openlineage/common/provider/dbt/processor.py:685: in get_run
    "dbt_run": self.dbt_run_run_facet(),
/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/openlineage/common/provider/dbt/processor.py:704: in dbt_run_run_facet
    return DbtRunRunFacet(invocation_id=self.run_metadata["invocation_id"])  # type: ignore[index]
E   KeyError: 'invocation_id'

Example failure: https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/15748852234


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.

@potiuk potiuk merged commit 398ba86 into apache:main Jun 19, 2025
55 checks passed
@kacpermuda
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM, It's caused by OpenLineage/OpenLineage#3738, now we're including invocation_id in DBT facets. @dolfinus am I assuming correctly that it's always in the metadata returned by DBT?

@dolfinus
Copy link
Contributor

According to https://github.com/dbt-labs/dbt-core/pull/4340/files#diff-33c94e40283afdfeba411a98c0628fc610c287e41c3477d88559f1e0244259c3R317, invocation_id is a part of manifest since dbt-core 1.0.0.
But in manifest schema https://github.com/dbt-labs/dbt-core/blob/main/schemas/dbt/manifest/v12.json this field is marked as nullable. Let's make it optional OpenLineage/OpenLineage#3796

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants