Skip to content

Conversation

@kaxil
Copy link
Member

@kaxil kaxil commented Jul 7, 2025

Sync v3-0-stable with 3.0.3rc4 changes

Only 2 user facing changes:


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.

potiuk and others added 8 commits July 7, 2025 16:32
) (apache#52896)

The task-sdk package did not have full integration with airflow
docs:

* did not have inventory mapping
* did not have a way to refer to it via doc:`task-sdk:` directive
8 did not have a development link from the devel index

This PR fixes all that.

(cherry picked from commit 244af72)
…dagrun is fetched. (apache#52918) (apache#52919)

(cherry picked from commit 671d561)

Co-authored-by: Karthikeyan Singaravelan <tir.karthi@gmail.com>
…build deps (apache#52909) (apache#52924)

I noticed that we did not have `pre-commit-uv` in the image
that was building the distribution packages. Adding it should
slightly speed up building such an image for isolated package
preparation.

The `uv` has been upgraded along the way, also the comment that
we should automate updating the versions in
release_management_command.py has been removed - because we
already have automation in place. The missing pieces were
adding "hatch", "pyyaml", "gitpython" and "rich".
(cherry picked from commit bbc8f74)
…distributions (apache#52908) (apache#52910)

The file might be a left-over from earlier api generation and it is
already .gitignored, so it does not appear in the source tarball,
but sdist and wheel generation does not look at .gitignored files
(for a good reason - we might want to include some generated files
in those distributions) - so we should exclude it manually similarly
as we already do with node_modules for example.
(cherry picked from commit 93f2bcc)

Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
…pache#52937)

(cherry picked from commit 601a06d)

Co-authored-by: GPK <gopidesupavan@gmail.com>
…y imports (apache#52956) (apache#52957)

(cherry picked from commit aecfc53)

Co-authored-by: GPK <gopidesupavan@gmail.com>
@kaxil kaxil merged commit 989295a into apache:v3-0-stable Jul 7, 2025
124 checks passed
@kaxil kaxil deleted the 3.0.3rc4-changes branch July 7, 2025 11:44
@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Jul 7, 2025

Nice!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:dev-tools area:production-image Production image improvements and fixes area:providers area:task-sdk area:UI Related to UI/UX. For Frontend Developers. backport-to-v3-1-test Mark PR with this label to backport to v3-1-test branch kind:documentation provider:standard

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants