Skip to content

Conversation

@pawelgrochowicz
Copy link
Contributor

@pawelgrochowicz pawelgrochowicz commented Oct 3, 2025

This PR adds OpenLineage support for CloudDataFusionStartPipelineOperator. I opened a new PR as the old one was too messy with changes not related to my code(#55573)


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.

@pawelgrochowicz pawelgrochowicz force-pushed the feature-ol-cloud-data-fusion-start-pipeline-operator branch from a8762ba to dabf2ef Compare October 3, 2025 15:18
@pawelgrochowicz
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mobuchowski,FYI the new PR with changes for CloudDataFusionStartPipelineOperator

Copy link
Contributor

@kacpermuda kacpermuda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving again, since the old one was closed.

@mobuchowski mobuchowski merged commit 5cb96f6 into apache:main Oct 9, 2025
80 checks passed
abdulrahman305 bot pushed a commit to abdulrahman305/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2025
…rator (apache#56365)

* feature: Add OpenLineage support for CloudDataFusionStartPipelineOperator

* feature: Add OpenLineage support for CloudDataFusionStartPipelineOperator
abdulrahman305 bot pushed a commit to abdulrahman305/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2025
…rator (apache#56365)

* feature: Add OpenLineage support for CloudDataFusionStartPipelineOperator

* feature: Add OpenLineage support for CloudDataFusionStartPipelineOperator
abdulrahman305 bot pushed a commit to abdulrahman305/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2025
…rator (apache#56365)

* feature: Add OpenLineage support for CloudDataFusionStartPipelineOperator

* feature: Add OpenLineage support for CloudDataFusionStartPipelineOperator
dabla pushed a commit to dabla/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2025
…rator (apache#56365)

* feature: Add OpenLineage support for CloudDataFusionStartPipelineOperator

* feature: Add OpenLineage support for CloudDataFusionStartPipelineOperator
abdulrahman305 bot pushed a commit to abdulrahman305/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2025
…rator (apache#56365)

* feature: Add OpenLineage support for CloudDataFusionStartPipelineOperator

* feature: Add OpenLineage support for CloudDataFusionStartPipelineOperator
abdulrahman305 bot pushed a commit to abdulrahman305/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2025
…rator (apache#56365)

* feature: Add OpenLineage support for CloudDataFusionStartPipelineOperator

* feature: Add OpenLineage support for CloudDataFusionStartPipelineOperator
abdulrahman305 bot pushed a commit to abdulrahman305/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2025
…rator (apache#56365)

* feature: Add OpenLineage support for CloudDataFusionStartPipelineOperator

* feature: Add OpenLineage support for CloudDataFusionStartPipelineOperator
abdulrahman305 bot pushed a commit to abdulrahman305/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2025
…rator (apache#56365)

* feature: Add OpenLineage support for CloudDataFusionStartPipelineOperator

* feature: Add OpenLineage support for CloudDataFusionStartPipelineOperator
TyrellHaywood pushed a commit to TyrellHaywood/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2025
…rator (apache#56365)

* feature: Add OpenLineage support for CloudDataFusionStartPipelineOperator

* feature: Add OpenLineage support for CloudDataFusionStartPipelineOperator
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:providers provider:google Google (including GCP) related issues

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants