Revert "Separate workers service accounts (#52357)" #60721
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This reverts commit 23d955d.
Miretpl
requested review from
dstandish,
hussein-awala,
jedcunningham and
jscheffl
as code owners
1 task
jscheffl
approved these changes
Jan 17, 2026
Contributor
jscheffl
left a comment
jscheffl
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for taking care and cleaning/fixing. I am sorry for the conflict generated by "fast merging".
I hope you can revert the reversion soon!
jason810496
pushed a commit
to jason810496/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2026
* Revert "Separate workers service accounts (apache#52357)" This reverts commit 23d955d. * Revert "Add newsfragment for 52357 PR (apache#59214)" * Fix security tests
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR reverts all changes made by #52357 and #59214. The separation needs to be fully reimplemented after #58547. Reimplementation will not be a part of #60420, but it will be done in future as part of #28880.
Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.