-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update all links to in progress jiras to issues #21749
Update all links to in progress jiras to issues #21749
Conversation
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
2 similar comments
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
R: @aijamalnk |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #21749 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 74.03% 74.03%
=======================================
Files 698 698
Lines 92192 92192
=======================================
Hits 68252 68252
Misses 22689 22689
Partials 1251 1251
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
@@ -2086,7 +2086,7 @@ private boolean hasStatementAndSetter() { | |||
private static class Reparallelize<T> extends PTransform<PCollection<T>, PCollection<T>> { | |||
@Override | |||
public PCollection<T> expand(PCollection<T> input) { | |||
// See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2803 | |||
// See https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/1796403 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks wrong / broken
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed - thanks!
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ def get_proto_pipeline(pipeline, options): | |||
default_environment=PortableRunner._create_environment( | |||
portable_options)) | |||
|
|||
# TODO: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-7199 | |||
# TODO: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/181099 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this looks broken as well
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed - thanks!
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ Here’s a list of things you can do to get started contributing: | |||
<td class="list-text-size-md"> | |||
<ul> | |||
<li>Follow the website <a href="https://beam.apache.org/contribute/get-started-contributing/">Contribution Guide</a> to make changes yourself.</li> | |||
<li>Check our <a href="https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-13229?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20website%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC">Website Backlog</a> in Jira to find rooms for improvement, or propose one.</li> | |||
<li>Check our <a href="https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/21251?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20website%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC">Website Backlog</a> in Jira to find rooms for improvement, or propose one.</li> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is not working as expected
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed - good catch
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ Examples: | |||
Beam DataFrame operations are deferred, but the schemas of the resulting DataFrames are not, meaning that result columns must be computable without access to the data. Some DataFrame operations can’t support this usage, so they can’t be implemented. These operations raise a [WontImplementError](https://beam.apache.org/releases/pydoc/{{< param release_latest >}}/apache_beam.dataframe.frame_base.html#apache_beam.dataframe.frame_base.WontImplementError). | |||
|
|||
<!-- TODO(BEAM-12169): Document the use of categorical columns as a workaround --> | |||
Currently there’s no workaround for this issue. But in the future, Beam Dataframe may support non-deferred column operations on categorical columns. This work is being tracked in [BEAM-12169](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12169). | |||
Currently there’s no workaround for this issue. But in the future, Beam Dataframe may support non-deferred column operations on categorical columns. This work is being tracked in [BEAM-12169](https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/20958). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
here the link text shows the JIRA issue but theaddress links to the github issue. I guess this is fine: [BEAM-12169](https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/20958)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I'm not too worried about fixing these types of instances - it doesn't make much of a difference IMO
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ Pipeline patterns demonstrate common Beam use cases. Pipeline patterns are based | |||
|
|||
## Contributing a pattern | |||
|
|||
To contribute a new pipeline pattern, create an issue with the [`pipeline-patterns` label](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-7449?jql=labels%20%3D%20pipeline-patterns) and add details to the issue description. See [Get started contributing](/contribute/) for more information. | |||
To contribute a new pipeline pattern, create [a feature request](https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/new?assignees=octocat&labels=new+feature%2Cawaiting+triage&template=feature.yml&title=%5BFeature+Request%5D%3A+) and add details to the issue description. See [Get started contributing](/contribute/) for more information. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this looks broken
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This one was actually correct, though the octocat piece wasn't needed (it doesn't harm anything though)
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ limitations under the License. | |||
|
|||
Easy to use Java 8 DSL for the Beam Java SDK. Provides a high-level abstraction of Beam transformations, which is both easy to read and write. Can be used as a complement to existing Beam pipelines (convertible back and forth). You can have a glimpse of the API at [WordCount example](/documentation/sdks/java/euphoria/#wordcount-example). | |||
|
|||
- JIRA: [dsl-euphoria](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4366?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20component%20%3D%20dsl-euphoria) / [BEAM-3900](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3900) | |||
- JIRA: [dsl-euphoria](https://github.com/apache/beam/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Adsl-euphoria) / [BEAM-3900](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3900) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this looks broken
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's actually correct
Run Java_Examples_Dataflow_Java11 PreCommit |
Run Java PreCommit |
LGTM merging. Please make sure to address outstanding in follow up. |
This was driven by a script that uses the mapping generated during the jira -> GH Issues migration. It takes all Jira links that aren't in CHANGES.md or the blog and maps them to the corresponding issue. This may not be comprehensive, but it moves the large majority of issues and helps set that as the standard going forward.
I'd recommend doing an audit review of this rather than going line by line. I did a full line by line review and caught a few string issues, but for the most part the tool did its job.
Part of #21686
Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:
R: @username
).CHANGES.md
with noteworthy changes.See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.
To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md
GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)
See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI.