Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[improvement](transaction) abort txn after be lost heartbeat over 1 min #22781

Merged

Conversation

yujun777
Copy link
Collaborator

@yujun777 yujun777 commented Aug 9, 2023

Proposed changes

Default heartbeat failure time is 5s, it's too sensitive to abort a txn.

Further comments

If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at dev@doris.apache.org by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...

@yujun777
Copy link
Collaborator Author

yujun777 commented Aug 9, 2023

run buildall

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result:
the sum of best hot time: 46.02 seconds
stream load tsv: 514 seconds loaded 74807831229 Bytes, about 138 MB/s
stream load json: 22 seconds loaded 2358488459 Bytes, about 102 MB/s
stream load orc: 65 seconds loaded 1101869774 Bytes, about 16 MB/s
stream load parquet: 32 seconds loaded 861443392 Bytes, about 25 MB/s
insert into select: 29.1 seconds inserted 10000000 Rows, about 343K ops/s
storage size: 17162223622 Bytes

Copy link
Contributor

@dataroaring dataroaring left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-actions github-actions bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Aug 9, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 9, 2023

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 9, 2023

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

Copy link
Contributor

@kaijchen kaijchen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, hard-coded value could be a config.

@dataroaring dataroaring merged commit 35dd787 into apache:master Aug 10, 2023
18 of 20 checks passed
@wm1581066 wm1581066 added the usercase Important user case type label label Aug 12, 2024
dataroaring pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2024
…#35342) (#39317)

cherry-pick:  #22781,  #28662, #35342

---------

Co-authored-by: HHoflittlefish777 <77738092+HHoflittlefish777@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. dev/2.0.15-merged reviewed usercase Important user case type label
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants