add thirdparty.tar.gz suffix #56
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
starocean999
pushed a commit
to starocean999/incubator-doris
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 26, 2023
morrySnow
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 21, 2024
…is not enough to provide all the data for the query (#33800) When the materialized view is not enough to provide all the data for the query, if the materialized view is increment update by partition. we can union materialized view and origin query to reponse the query. this depends on #33362 such as materialized view def is as following: > CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW mv_10086 > BUILD IMMEDIATE REFRESH AUTO ON MANUAL > partition by(l_shipdate) > DISTRIBUTED BY RANDOM BUCKETS 2 > PROPERTIES ('replication_num' = '1') > AS > select l_shipdate, o_orderdate, l_partkey, l_suppkey, sum(o_totalprice) as sum_total > from lineitem > left join orders on lineitem.l_orderkey = orders.o_orderkey and l_shipdate = o_orderdate > group by > l_shipdate, > o_orderdate, > l_partkey, > l_suppkey; the materialized view data is as following: +------------+-------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ | l_shipdate | o_orderdate | l_partkey | l_suppkey | sum_total | +------------+-------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ | 2023-10-18 | 2023-10-18 | 2 | 3 | 109.20 | | 2023-10-17 | 2023-10-17 | 2 | 3 | 99.50 | | 2023-10-19 | 2023-10-19 | 2 | 3 | 99.50 | +------------+-------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ when we insert data to partition `2023-10-17`, if we run query as following ``` select l_shipdate, o_orderdate, l_partkey, l_suppkey, sum(o_totalprice) as sum_total from lineitem left join orders on lineitem.l_orderkey = orders.o_orderkey and l_shipdate = o_orderdate group by l_shipdate, o_orderdate, l_partkey, l_suppkey; ``` query rewrite by materialzied view will fail with message `Check partition query used validation fail` if we turn on the switch `SET enable_materialized_view_union_rewrite = true;` default true we run the query above again, it will success and will use union all materialized view and origin query to response the query correctly. the plan is as following: ``` | Explain String(Nereids Planner) | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | PLAN FRAGMENT 0 | | OUTPUT EXPRS: | | l_shipdate[#52] | | o_orderdate[#53] | | l_partkey[#54] | | l_suppkey[#55] | | sum_total[#56] | | PARTITION: UNPARTITIONED | | | | HAS_COLO_PLAN_NODE: false | | | | VRESULT SINK | | MYSQL_PROTOCAL | | | | 11:VEXCHANGE | | offset: 0 | | distribute expr lists: | | | | PLAN FRAGMENT 1 | | | | PARTITION: HASH_PARTITIONED: l_shipdate[#42], o_orderdate[#43], l_partkey[#44], l_suppkey[#45] | | | | HAS_COLO_PLAN_NODE: false | | | | STREAM DATA SINK | | EXCHANGE ID: 11 | | UNPARTITIONED | | | | 10:VUNION(756) | | | | | |----9:VAGGREGATE (merge finalize)(753) | | | | output: sum(partial_sum(o_totalprice)[#46])[#51] | | | | group by: l_shipdate[#42], o_orderdate[#43], l_partkey[#44], l_suppkey[#45] | | | | cardinality=2 | | | | distribute expr lists: l_shipdate[#42], o_orderdate[#43], l_partkey[#44], l_suppkey[#45] | | | | | | | 8:VEXCHANGE | | | offset: 0 | | | distribute expr lists: l_shipdate[#42] | | | | | 1:VEXCHANGE | | offset: 0 | | distribute expr lists: | | | | PLAN FRAGMENT 2 | | | | PARTITION: HASH_PARTITIONED: o_orderkey[#21], o_orderdate[#25] | | | | HAS_COLO_PLAN_NODE: false | | | | STREAM DATA SINK | | EXCHANGE ID: 08 | | HASH_PARTITIONED: l_shipdate[#42], o_orderdate[#43], l_partkey[#44], l_suppkey[#45] | | | | 7:VAGGREGATE (update serialize)(747) | | | STREAMING | | | output: partial_sum(o_totalprice[#41])[#46] | | | group by: l_shipdate[#37], o_orderdate[#38], l_partkey[#39], l_suppkey[#40] | | | cardinality=2 | | | distribute expr lists: l_shipdate[#37] | | | | | 6:VHASH JOIN(741) | | | join op: RIGHT OUTER JOIN(PARTITIONED)[] | | | equal join conjunct: (o_orderkey[#21] = l_orderkey[#5]) | | | equal join conjunct: (o_orderdate[#25] = l_shipdate[#15]) | | | runtime filters: RF000[min_max] <- l_orderkey[#5](2/2/2048), RF001[bloom] <- l_orderkey[#5](2/2/2048), RF002[min_max] <- l_shipdate[#15](1/1/2048), RF003[bloom] <- l_shipdate[#15](1/1/2048) | | | cardinality=2 | | | vec output tuple id: 4 | | | output tuple id: 4 | | | vIntermediate tuple ids: 3 | | | hash output slot ids: 6 7 24 25 15 | | | final projections: l_shipdate[#36], o_orderdate[#32], l_partkey[#34], l_suppkey[#35], o_totalprice[#31] | | | final project output tuple id: 4 | | | distribute expr lists: o_orderkey[#21], o_orderdate[#25] | | | distribute expr lists: l_orderkey[#5], l_shipdate[#15] | | | | | |----3:VEXCHANGE | | | offset: 0 | | | distribute expr lists: l_orderkey[#5] | | | | | 5:VEXCHANGE | | offset: 0 | | distribute expr lists: | | | | PLAN FRAGMENT 3 | | | | PARTITION: RANDOM | | | | HAS_COLO_PLAN_NODE: false | | | | STREAM DATA SINK | | EXCHANGE ID: 05 | | HASH_PARTITIONED: o_orderkey[#21], o_orderdate[#25] | | | | 4:VOlapScanNode(722) | | TABLE: union_db.orders(orders), PREAGGREGATION: ON | | runtime filters: RF000[min_max] -> o_orderkey[#21], RF001[bloom] -> o_orderkey[#21], RF002[min_max] -> o_orderdate[#25], RF003[bloom] -> o_orderdate[#25] | | partitions=3/3 (p_20231017,p_20231018,p_20231019), tablets=9/9, tabletList=161188,161190,161192 ... | | cardinality=3, avgRowSize=0.0, numNodes=1 | | pushAggOp=NONE | | | | PLAN FRAGMENT 4 | | | | PARTITION: HASH_PARTITIONED: l_orderkey[#5] | | | | HAS_COLO_PLAN_NODE: false | | | | STREAM DATA SINK | | EXCHANGE ID: 03 | | HASH_PARTITIONED: l_orderkey[#5], l_shipdate[#15] | | | | 2:VOlapScanNode(729) | | TABLE: union_db.lineitem(lineitem), PREAGGREGATION: ON | | PREDICATES: (l_shipdate[#15] >= '2023-10-17') AND (l_shipdate[#15] < '2023-10-18') | | partitions=1/3 (p_20231017), tablets=3/3, tabletList=161223,161225,161227 | | cardinality=2, avgRowSize=0.0, numNodes=1 | | pushAggOp=NONE | | | | PLAN FRAGMENT 5 | | | | PARTITION: RANDOM | | | | HAS_COLO_PLAN_NODE: false | | | | STREAM DATA SINK | | EXCHANGE ID: 01 | | RANDOM | | | | 0:VOlapScanNode(718) | | TABLE: union_db.mv_10086(mv_10086), PREAGGREGATION: ON | | partitions=2/3 (p_20231018_20231019,p_20231019_20231020), tablets=4/4, tabletList=161251,161253,161265 ... | | cardinality=2, avgRowSize=0.0, numNodes=1 | | pushAggOp=NONE | | | | MaterializedView | | MaterializedViewRewriteSuccessAndChose: | | Names: mv_10086 | | MaterializedViewRewriteSuccessButNotChose: | | | | MaterializedViewRewriteFail: | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ```
yiguolei
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 21, 2024
…is not enough to provide all the data for the query (#33800) When the materialized view is not enough to provide all the data for the query, if the materialized view is increment update by partition. we can union materialized view and origin query to reponse the query. this depends on #33362 such as materialized view def is as following: > CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW mv_10086 > BUILD IMMEDIATE REFRESH AUTO ON MANUAL > partition by(l_shipdate) > DISTRIBUTED BY RANDOM BUCKETS 2 > PROPERTIES ('replication_num' = '1') > AS > select l_shipdate, o_orderdate, l_partkey, l_suppkey, sum(o_totalprice) as sum_total > from lineitem > left join orders on lineitem.l_orderkey = orders.o_orderkey and l_shipdate = o_orderdate > group by > l_shipdate, > o_orderdate, > l_partkey, > l_suppkey; the materialized view data is as following: +------------+-------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ | l_shipdate | o_orderdate | l_partkey | l_suppkey | sum_total | +------------+-------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ | 2023-10-18 | 2023-10-18 | 2 | 3 | 109.20 | | 2023-10-17 | 2023-10-17 | 2 | 3 | 99.50 | | 2023-10-19 | 2023-10-19 | 2 | 3 | 99.50 | +------------+-------------+-----------+-----------+-----------+ when we insert data to partition `2023-10-17`, if we run query as following ``` select l_shipdate, o_orderdate, l_partkey, l_suppkey, sum(o_totalprice) as sum_total from lineitem left join orders on lineitem.l_orderkey = orders.o_orderkey and l_shipdate = o_orderdate group by l_shipdate, o_orderdate, l_partkey, l_suppkey; ``` query rewrite by materialzied view will fail with message `Check partition query used validation fail` if we turn on the switch `SET enable_materialized_view_union_rewrite = true;` default true we run the query above again, it will success and will use union all materialized view and origin query to response the query correctly. the plan is as following: ``` | Explain String(Nereids Planner) | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | PLAN FRAGMENT 0 | | OUTPUT EXPRS: | | l_shipdate[#52] | | o_orderdate[#53] | | l_partkey[#54] | | l_suppkey[#55] | | sum_total[#56] | | PARTITION: UNPARTITIONED | | | | HAS_COLO_PLAN_NODE: false | | | | VRESULT SINK | | MYSQL_PROTOCAL | | | | 11:VEXCHANGE | | offset: 0 | | distribute expr lists: | | | | PLAN FRAGMENT 1 | | | | PARTITION: HASH_PARTITIONED: l_shipdate[#42], o_orderdate[#43], l_partkey[#44], l_suppkey[#45] | | | | HAS_COLO_PLAN_NODE: false | | | | STREAM DATA SINK | | EXCHANGE ID: 11 | | UNPARTITIONED | | | | 10:VUNION(756) | | | | | |----9:VAGGREGATE (merge finalize)(753) | | | | output: sum(partial_sum(o_totalprice)[#46])[#51] | | | | group by: l_shipdate[#42], o_orderdate[#43], l_partkey[#44], l_suppkey[#45] | | | | cardinality=2 | | | | distribute expr lists: l_shipdate[#42], o_orderdate[#43], l_partkey[#44], l_suppkey[#45] | | | | | | | 8:VEXCHANGE | | | offset: 0 | | | distribute expr lists: l_shipdate[#42] | | | | | 1:VEXCHANGE | | offset: 0 | | distribute expr lists: | | | | PLAN FRAGMENT 2 | | | | PARTITION: HASH_PARTITIONED: o_orderkey[#21], o_orderdate[#25] | | | | HAS_COLO_PLAN_NODE: false | | | | STREAM DATA SINK | | EXCHANGE ID: 08 | | HASH_PARTITIONED: l_shipdate[#42], o_orderdate[#43], l_partkey[#44], l_suppkey[#45] | | | | 7:VAGGREGATE (update serialize)(747) | | | STREAMING | | | output: partial_sum(o_totalprice[#41])[#46] | | | group by: l_shipdate[#37], o_orderdate[#38], l_partkey[#39], l_suppkey[#40] | | | cardinality=2 | | | distribute expr lists: l_shipdate[#37] | | | | | 6:VHASH JOIN(741) | | | join op: RIGHT OUTER JOIN(PARTITIONED)[] | | | equal join conjunct: (o_orderkey[#21] = l_orderkey[#5]) | | | equal join conjunct: (o_orderdate[#25] = l_shipdate[#15]) | | | runtime filters: RF000[min_max] <- l_orderkey[#5](2/2/2048), RF001[bloom] <- l_orderkey[#5](2/2/2048), RF002[min_max] <- l_shipdate[#15](1/1/2048), RF003[bloom] <- l_shipdate[#15](1/1/2048) | | | cardinality=2 | | | vec output tuple id: 4 | | | output tuple id: 4 | | | vIntermediate tuple ids: 3 | | | hash output slot ids: 6 7 24 25 15 | | | final projections: l_shipdate[#36], o_orderdate[#32], l_partkey[#34], l_suppkey[#35], o_totalprice[#31] | | | final project output tuple id: 4 | | | distribute expr lists: o_orderkey[#21], o_orderdate[#25] | | | distribute expr lists: l_orderkey[#5], l_shipdate[#15] | | | | | |----3:VEXCHANGE | | | offset: 0 | | | distribute expr lists: l_orderkey[#5] | | | | | 5:VEXCHANGE | | offset: 0 | | distribute expr lists: | | | | PLAN FRAGMENT 3 | | | | PARTITION: RANDOM | | | | HAS_COLO_PLAN_NODE: false | | | | STREAM DATA SINK | | EXCHANGE ID: 05 | | HASH_PARTITIONED: o_orderkey[#21], o_orderdate[#25] | | | | 4:VOlapScanNode(722) | | TABLE: union_db.orders(orders), PREAGGREGATION: ON | | runtime filters: RF000[min_max] -> o_orderkey[#21], RF001[bloom] -> o_orderkey[#21], RF002[min_max] -> o_orderdate[#25], RF003[bloom] -> o_orderdate[#25] | | partitions=3/3 (p_20231017,p_20231018,p_20231019), tablets=9/9, tabletList=161188,161190,161192 ... | | cardinality=3, avgRowSize=0.0, numNodes=1 | | pushAggOp=NONE | | | | PLAN FRAGMENT 4 | | | | PARTITION: HASH_PARTITIONED: l_orderkey[#5] | | | | HAS_COLO_PLAN_NODE: false | | | | STREAM DATA SINK | | EXCHANGE ID: 03 | | HASH_PARTITIONED: l_orderkey[#5], l_shipdate[#15] | | | | 2:VOlapScanNode(729) | | TABLE: union_db.lineitem(lineitem), PREAGGREGATION: ON | | PREDICATES: (l_shipdate[#15] >= '2023-10-17') AND (l_shipdate[#15] < '2023-10-18') | | partitions=1/3 (p_20231017), tablets=3/3, tabletList=161223,161225,161227 | | cardinality=2, avgRowSize=0.0, numNodes=1 | | pushAggOp=NONE | | | | PLAN FRAGMENT 5 | | | | PARTITION: RANDOM | | | | HAS_COLO_PLAN_NODE: false | | | | STREAM DATA SINK | | EXCHANGE ID: 01 | | RANDOM | | | | 0:VOlapScanNode(718) | | TABLE: union_db.mv_10086(mv_10086), PREAGGREGATION: ON | | partitions=2/3 (p_20231018_20231019,p_20231019_20231020), tablets=4/4, tabletList=161251,161253,161265 ... | | cardinality=2, avgRowSize=0.0, numNodes=1 | | pushAggOp=NONE | | | | MaterializedView | | MaterializedViewRewriteSuccessAndChose: | | Names: mv_10086 | | MaterializedViewRewriteSuccessButNotChose: | | | | MaterializedViewRewriteFail: | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ```
3 tasks
lide-reed
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2025
### What problem does this PR solve? In branch-2.0, we already refractor these codes in pr: #18590 Deadlock stack: 1、While load, we alloc MemTracker and need lock TrackerGroup.group_lock ``` NodeChannel::NodeChannel _node_channel_tracker = std::make_shared<MemTracker> MemTracker::bind_parent std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l(mem_tracker_pool[_parent_group_num].group_lock); _tracker_group_it = mem_tracker_pool[_parent_group_num].trackers.insert( mem_tracker_pool[_parent_group_num].trackers.end(), this); ``` 2、but while we try to call std::list::insert, we need alloc std::_List_node，here new_hook (in file tcmalloc_hook.h) is triggered, then we lock the same TrackerGroup.group_lock, make it deadlock ``` new_hook doris::ThreadMemTrackerMgr::consume doris::ThreadMemTrackerMgr::flush_untracked_mem<true, true> doris::ThreadMemTrackerMgr::exceeded doris::MemTrackerLimiter::print_log_usage doris::MemTracker::make_group_snapshot std::lock_guard<std::mutex> l(mem_tracker_pool[group_num].group_lock); ``` Full stack info: ``` (gdb) bt #0 0x00007f219772454d in __lll_lock_wait () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 #1 0x00007f219771fe9b in _L_lock_883 () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 #2 0x00007f219771fd68 in pthread_mutex_lock () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 #3 0x0000563ca7a8a824 in __gthread_mutex_lock (__mutex=0x563cb18cbc58) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/c++/11/bits/gthr-default.h:749 #4 std::mutex::lock (this=0x563cb18cbc58) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/include/c++/11/bits/std_mutex.h:100 #5 std::lock_guard<std::mutex>::lock_guard (__m=..., this=<synthetic pointer>) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/include/c++/11/bits/std_mutex.h:229 #6 doris::MemTracker::make_group_snapshot (snapshots=0x7f1f7fe06ea0, group_num=<optimized out>, parent_label=...) at /data/TCHouse-D-1.2/be/src/runtime/memory/mem_tracker.cpp:115 #7 0x0000563ca7a7eeb4 in doris::MemTrackerLimiter::print_log_usage (this=0x5640ab7956c0, msg=...) at /data/TCHouse-D-1.2/be/src/runtime/memory/mem_tracker_limiter.cpp:198 #8 0x0000563ca7a8d1e4 in doris::ThreadMemTrackerMgr::exceeded (this=this@entry=0x563ce6a2c820, size=1048584) at /data/TCHouse-D-1.2/be/src/runtime/memory/thread_mem_tracker_mgr.cpp:59 #9 0x0000563ca78cfeb4 in doris::ThreadMemTrackerMgr::flush_untracked_mem<true, true> (this=0x563ce6a2c820) at /data/TCHouse-D-1.2/be/src/runtime/memory/thread_mem_tracker_mgr.h:223 #10 doris::ThreadMemTrackerMgr::consume (size=<optimized out>, this=0x563ce6a2c820) at /data/TCHouse-D-1.2/be/src/runtime/memory/thread_mem_tracker_mgr.h:188 #11 doris::ThreadMemTrackerMgr::consume (size=<optimized out>, this=0x563ce6a2c820) at /data/TCHouse-D-1.2/be/src/runtime/memory/thread_mem_tracker_mgr.h:178 #12 new_hook (ptr=<optimized out>, size=24) at /data/TCHouse-D-1.2/be/src/runtime/memory/tcmalloc_hook.h:39 #13 0x0000563caf3dfa78 in MallocHook::InvokeNewHookSlow (p=p@entry=0x56422d713b40, s=s@entry=24) at src/malloc_hook.cc:498 #14 0x0000563caf55f2c1 in MallocHook::InvokeNewHook (s=24, p=0x56422d713b40) at src/malloc_hook-inl.h:127 #15 tcmalloc::do_allocate_full<tcmalloc::cpp_throw_oom> (size=size@entry=24) at src/tcmalloc.cc:1805 #16 tcmalloc::allocate_full_cpp_throw_oom (size=size@entry=24) at src/tcmalloc.cc:1815 #17 0x0000563caf55f429 in tcmalloc::dispatch_allocate_full<tcmalloc::cpp_throw_oom> (size=24) at src/tcmalloc.cc:1822 #18 0x0000563ca7a8ab9a in __gnu_cxx::new_allocator<std::_List_node<doris::MemTracker*> >::allocate (__n=1, this=0x563cb18cbc40) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/include/c++/11/ext/new_allocator.h:103 #19 std::allocator_traits<std::allocator<std::_List_node<doris::MemTracker*> > >::allocate (__n=1, __a=...) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/include/c++/11/bits/alloc_traits.h:460 #20 std::__cxx11::_List_base<doris::MemTracker*, std::allocator<doris::MemTracker*> >::_M_get_node (this=0x563cb18cbc40) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/include/c++/11/bits/stl_list.h:442 #21 std::__cxx11::list<doris::MemTracker*, std::allocator<doris::MemTracker*> >::_M_create_node<doris::MemTracker*> (this=0x563cb18cbc40) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/include/c++/11/bits/stl_list.h:634 #22 std::__cxx11::list<doris::MemTracker*, std::allocator<doris::MemTracker*> >::emplace<doris::MemTracker*> (__position=..., this=0x563cb18cbc40) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/include/c++/11/bits/list.tcc:92 #23 std::__cxx11::list<doris::MemTracker*, std::allocator<doris::MemTracker*> >::insert (__x=<optimized out>, __position=..., this=0x563cb18cbc40) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/include/c++/11/bits/stl_list.h:1309 #24 doris::MemTracker::bind_parent (this=0x563eff46ad10, parent=<optimized out>) at /data/TCHouse-D-1.2/be/src/runtime/memory/mem_tracker.cpp:79 #25 0x0000563ca7a8b608 in doris::MemTracker::MemTracker (this=this@entry=0x563eff46ad10, label=..., parent=parent@entry=0x0) at /data/TCHouse-D-1.2/be/src/runtime/memory/mem_tracker.cpp:66 #26 0x0000563ca7967467 in __gnu_cxx::new_allocator<doris::MemTracker>::construct<doris::MemTracker, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > (__p=0x563eff46ad10, this=<optimized out>) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/include/c++/11/ext/new_allocator.h:154 #27 std::allocator_traits<std::allocator<doris::MemTracker> >::construct<doris::MemTracker, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > (__p=0x563eff46ad10, __a=...) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/include/c++/11/bits/alloc_traits.h:512 #28 std::_Sp_counted_ptr_inplace<doris::MemTracker, std::allocator<doris::MemTracker>, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_Sp_counted_ptr_inplace<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > (__a=..., this=0x563eff46ad00) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/include/c++/11/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:519 #29 std::__shared_count<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::__shared_count<doris::MemTracker, std::allocator<doris::MemTracker>, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > (__a=..., __p=<optimized out>, this=<optimized out>) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/include/c++/11/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:650 #30 std::__shared_ptr<doris::MemTracker, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::__shared_ptr<std::allocator<doris::MemTracker>, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > (__tag=..., this=<optimized out>) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/include/c++/11/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:1337 #31 std::shared_ptr<doris::MemTracker>::shared_ptr<std::allocator<doris::MemTracker>, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > (__tag=..., this=<optimized out>) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/include/c++/11/bits/shared_ptr.h:409 #32 std::allocate_shared<doris::MemTracker, std::allocator<doris::MemTracker>, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > (__a=...) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/include/c++/11/bits/shared_ptr.h:861 #33 std::make_shared<doris::MemTracker, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > () at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/include/c++/11/bits/shared_ptr.h:877 #34 doris::stream_load::NodeChannel::NodeChannel (this=this@entry=0x563d0ca7e110, parent=<optimized out>, index_channel=index_channel@entry=0x563d4b43f200, node_id=<optimized out>) at /data/TCHouse-D-1.2/be/src/exec/tablet_sink.cpp:49 #35 0x0000563cac74a82d in doris::stream_load::VNodeChannel::VNodeChannel (this=this@entry=0x563d0ca7e110, parent=<optimized out>, index_channel=index_channel@entry=0x563d4b43f200, node_id=<optimized out>) at /data/TCHouse-D-1.2/be/src/vec/sink/vtablet_sink.cpp:37 #36 0x0000563ca7967eaa in __gnu_cxx::new_allocator<doris::stream_load::VNodeChannel>::construct<doris::stream_load::VNodeChannel, doris::stream_load::OlapTableSink*&, doris::stream_load::IndexChannel*, long&> (__p=0x563d0ca7e110, this=<optimized out>) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/include/c++/11/ext/new_allocator.h:154 #37 std::allocator_traits<std::allocator<doris::stream_load::VNodeChannel> >::construct<doris::stream_load::VNodeChannel, doris::stream_load::OlapTableSink*&, doris::stream_load::IndexChannel*, long&> (__p=0x563d0ca7e110, __a=...) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/include/c++/11/bits/alloc_traits.h:512 #38 std::_Sp_counted_ptr_inplace<doris::stream_load::VNodeChannel, std::allocator<doris::stream_load::VNodeChannel>, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_Sp_counted_ptr_inplace<doris::stream_load::OlapTableSink*&, doris::stream_load::IndexChannel*, long&> (__a=..., this=0x563d0ca7e100) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/include/c++/11/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:519 #39 std::__shared_count<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::__shared_count<doris::stream_load::VNodeChannel, std::allocator<doris::stream_load::VNodeChannel>, doris::stream_load::OlapTableSink*&, doris::stream_load::IndexChannel*, long&> (__a=..., __p=<optimized out>, this=<optimized out>) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/include/c++/11/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:650 #40 std::__shared_ptr<doris::stream_load::VNodeChannel, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::__shared_ptr<std::allocator<doris::stream_load::VNodeChannel>, doris::stream_load::OlapTableSink*&, doris::stream_load::IndexChannel*, long&> (__tag=..., this=<optimized out>) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/include/c++/11/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:1337 #41 std::shared_ptr<doris::stream_load::VNodeChannel>::shared_ptr<std::allocator<doris::stream_load::VNodeChannel>, doris::stream_load::OlapTableSink*&, doris::stream_load::IndexChannel*, long&> (__tag=..., this=<optimized out>) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/include/c++/11/bits/shared_ptr.h:409 #42 std::allocate_shared<doris::stream_load::VNodeChannel, std::allocator<doris::stream_load::VNodeChannel>, doris::stream_load::OlapTableSink*&, doris::stream_load::IndexChannel*, long&> (__a=...) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/include/c++/11/bits/shared_ptr.h:861 #43 std::make_shared<doris::stream_load::VNodeChannel, doris::stream_load::OlapTableSink*&, doris::stream_load::IndexChannel*, long&> () at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/include/c++/11/bits/shared_ptr.h:877 #44 doris::stream_load::IndexChannel::init (this=this@entry=0x563d4b43f200, state=state@entry=0x563e027a3500, tablets=...) at /data/TCHouse-D-1.2/be/src/exec/tablet_sink.cpp:705 #45 0x0000563ca79698d8 in doris::stream_load::OlapTableSink::prepare (this=this@entry=0x5644b9efe880, state=state@entry=0x563e027a3500) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/include/c++/11/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:1290 #46 0x0000563cac74db65 in doris::stream_load::VOlapTableSink::prepare (this=0x5644b9efe880, state=0x563e027a3500) at /data/TCHouse-D-1.2/be/src/vec/sink/vtablet_sink.cpp:450 #47 0x0000563ca7946c21 in doris::PlanFragmentExecutor::prepare (this=this@entry=0x563f55efd280, request=..., fragments_ctx=<optimized out>) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/include/c++/11/bits/unique_ptr.h:173 #48 0x0000563ca791f17c in doris::FragmentExecState::prepare (this=this@entry=0x563f55efd200, params=...) --Type <RET> for more, q to quit, c to continue without paging-- at /data/TCHouse-D-1.2/be/src/runtime/fragment_mgr.cpp:238 #49 0x0000563ca7926629 in doris::FragmentMgr::exec_plan_fragment(doris::TExecPlanFragmentParams const&, std::function<void (doris::PlanFragmentExecutor*)>) (this=this@entry=0x563cb6e93400, params=..., cb=...) at /data/TCHouse-D-1.2/be/src/runtime/fragment_mgr.cpp:720 #50 0x0000563ca7928dab in doris::FragmentMgr::exec_plan_fragment (this=0x563cb6e93400, params=...) at /data/TCHouse-D-1.2/be/src/runtime/fragment_mgr.cpp:564 #51 0x0000563ca7aaf507 in doris::PInternalServiceImpl::_exec_plan_fragment_impl (this=this@entry=0x563cb577b880, ser_request=..., version=<optimized out>, compact=<optimized out>) at /data/TCHouse-D-1.2/be/src/service/internal_service.cpp:480 #52 0x0000563ca7aaf703 in doris::PInternalServiceImpl::_exec_plan_fragment_in_pthread (this=0x563cb577b880, controller=<optimized out>, request=0x563d6c5bb9b0, response=0x564203b92ce0, done=0x563d885a60c0) at /data/TCHouse-D-1.2/be/src/service/internal_service.cpp:254 #53 0x0000563ca78d6dbd in std::function<void ()>::operator()() const (this=0x7f1f7fe090c8) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/include/c++/11/bits/std_function.h:560 #54 doris::PriorityThreadPool::work_thread (this=0x563cb577ba38, thread_id=<optimized out>) at /data/TCHouse-D-1.2/be/src/util/priority_thread_pool.hpp:145 #55 0x0000563caf526b00 in std::execute_native_thread_routine (__p=0x563cbfc81d10) at ../../../../../libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/thread.cc:82 #56 0x00007f219771dea5 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 #57 0x00007f2197a309fd in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6 ``` ### Release note None ### Check List (For Author) - Test <!-- At least one of them must be included. --> - [ ] Regression test - [ ] Unit Test - [ ] Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below) - [ ] No need to test or manual test. Explain why: - [ ] This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed. - [ ] Previous test can cover this change. - [ ] No code files have been changed. - [ ] Other reason <!-- Add your reason? --> - Behavior changed: - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Explain the behavior change --> - Does this need documentation? - [ ] No. - [ ] Yes. <!-- Add document PR link here. eg: apache/doris-website#1214 --> ### Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR) - [ ] Confirm the release note - [ ] Confirm test cases - [ ] Confirm document - [ ] Add branch pick label <!-- Add branch pick label that this PR should merge into -->
3 tasks
Hastyshell
pushed a commit
to Hastyshell/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 12, 2025
…che#56… (apache#4953) …120) Otherwise, auto partition on multi bes may lead to segment num mismatch problem. ## Proposed changes Issue Number: close #xxx <!--Describe your changes.--> Co-authored-by: Yongqiang YANG <yangyogqiang@selectdb.com> Co-authored-by: Xin Liao <liaoxinbit@126.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.