[Bug] Ignore drop table log when table has been dropped #5973
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed changes
Although the table lock can control the simultaneous modification of the table by different threads.
But it cannot control the drop operation of the table by other threads.
For example, when drop table and table update occur at the same time.
get table object by thread 1
drop table by thread 2 with table lock
update table object by thread 1
The above process is possible.
At this time, step 3 actually operates a table that no longer exists, which will eventually cause NullPointerException.
In fact, the modified table log after the drop table can be ignored. The reason is that it is meaningless to modify information on a table that no longer exists.
Fixed #5687
Types of changes
What types of changes does your code introduce to Doris?
Put an
xin the boxes that applyChecklist
Put an
xin the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.Further comments
If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at dev@doris.apache.org by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...