-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding licenses and enable apache-rat-plugin. #6215
Conversation
Change-Id: I4685a2d9f1e147855dba69329b286f2d5bee3c18
… ones Change-Id: I2a9efde6f4b984bc1ac90483e90d98e71f818a14
Although am not sure about 94dd5e5 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @b-slim!!
I commented on a few files that I think need some work. The ones I didn't comment on looked ok to me.
@@ -1,3 +1,21 @@ | |||
/* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This header isn't accurate, see discussion on #5835 (comment). I think the policy on https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#3party guides us regarding what to do here.
The CONCISE libraries definitely sound like third-party since they are "work submitted directly to the ASF for which the submitter is not the copyright owner or owner's agent". So, we're not supposed to modify the original license headers. Checking out metamx/extendedset@02366f1#diff-33bd87cac0991642db64c5259e881ae0R41, this file was originally copied from another file ConciseSet.java, which had the following license header. I think we should start from this one.
/*
* (c) 2010 Alessandro Colantonio
* <mailto:colanton@mat.uniroma3.it>
* <http://ricerca.mat.uniroma3.it/users/colanton>
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*/
But also, the Apache license says "You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices stating that You changed the files". So I think we should modify the header to add that parts of it are also licensed to ASF (i.e. the parts that were changed after Alessandro wrote the original version). Maybe something like this will get the point across.
/*
* (c) 2010 Alessandro Colantonio
* <mailto:colanton@mat.uniroma3.it>
* <http://ricerca.mat.uniroma3.it/users/colanton>
*
* Modified at the Apache Software Foundation (ASF).
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*/
@@ -1,3 +1,21 @@ | |||
/* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same comment as for ConciseSetUtils.
@@ -1,3 +1,21 @@ | |||
/* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I went and double-checked this file. It was contributed in #5440 by @njhartwell, and it looks like he authored this file and intended to contribute it. So I think we are good to add this header.
@@ -1,3 +1,21 @@ | |||
<!-- |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This (and the other Hadoop XMLs) are probably derivative works of the examples provided by Apache Hadoop. However, since it's another ASF project I think we are okay here, given the policy on https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers.
@@ -1,3 +1,18 @@ | |||
# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This comes from https://github.com/sequenceiq/hadoop-docker so the header here is probably not right. That is a third party work (https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#3party). The original file didn't have a license header, but it was distributed along with an Apache 2.0 LICENSE file, so I think it's clear that the original file is Apache licensed.
I don't see a clear policy about what to do here, but maybe a header like this will get the point across. It's the non-ASF version of the Apache 2.0 header with an extra sentence at the top.
# Based on the SequenceIQ hadoop-docker project hosted at
# https://github.com/sequenceiq/hadoop-docker, and modified at
# the Apache Software Foundation (ASF).
#
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
# You may obtain a copy of the License at
#
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
#
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
# limitations under the License.
@@ -1,24 +1,19 @@ | |||
/* | |||
* File: jquery.dataTables.js |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can't change a license header like this. The policy on https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html says that 3-clause BSD is OK to include, though. So I guess we should keep this header the way it is and add an exception to rat. If possible, the exception should be scoped to just this file.
Change-Id: I49805c47dd527affe3ad0ae02747c1828a9e6847
@b-slim can you update and resolve conflicts? |
@b-slim are you able to continue working on this? |
Change-Id: Ia15f4b536c66390eaa6cbb98ec62885798dda73f
Change-Id: I0256c930b7f9a5bb09b44b5e7a149e6ec48cb0ca
Change-Id: I1355e8a2549e76cd44487abec142be79bec59de2
@gianm thanks for review can you please recheck this. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @b-slim! This LGTM.
This PR Adds Apache rat plugin as part of mvn build to check all the licenses as part of verify goal.
Also adds licenses to Misc files.
Fixes Issue #5665.