Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Adapt the service level component field in E2E #10530

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 21, 2023
Merged

Adapt the service level component field in E2E #10530

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 21, 2023

Conversation

mrproliu
Copy link
Contributor

Following #10522 (comment), adapt the component field in the E2E

  • If this pull request closes/resolves/fixes an existing issue, replace the issue number. Closes #.
  • Update the CHANGES log.

@mrproliu mrproliu marked this pull request as draft March 13, 2023 06:28
@wu-sheng wu-sheng added backend OAP backend related. test Test requirements about performance, feature or before release. labels Mar 13, 2023
@mrproliu mrproliu marked this pull request as ready for review March 21, 2023 06:08
@mrproliu mrproliu requested a review from wu-sheng March 21, 2023 06:08
@mrproliu mrproliu added this to the 9.5.0 milestone Mar 21, 2023
wu-sheng
wu-sheng approved these changes Mar 21, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@wu-sheng wu-sheng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks for polishing this.

@wu-sheng wu-sheng merged commit c217ead into apache:master Mar 21, 2023
@mrproliu mrproliu deleted the components-e2e branch March 21, 2023 06:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@wu-sheng wu-sheng wu-sheng approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
backend OAP backend related. test Test requirements about performance, feature or before release.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
9.5.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@mrproliu @wu-sheng