Skip to content

Conversation

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

@rxin rxin commented Jun 16, 2016

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This patch renames various Parquet support classes from CatalystAbc to ParquetAbc. This new naming makes more sense for two reasons:

  1. These are not optimizer related (i.e. Catalyst) classes.
  2. We are in the Spark code base, and as a result it'd be more clear to call out these are Parquet support classes, rather than some Spark classes.

How was this patch tested?

Renamed test cases as well.

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor Author

rxin commented Jun 16, 2016

#13696 is the original patch for master.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jun 16, 2016

Test build #60626 has finished for PR 13700 at commit 036662b.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jun 16, 2016

Test build #3118 has finished for PR 13700 at commit 036662b.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jun 16, 2016

Test build #3117 has finished for PR 13700 at commit 036662b.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor Author

rxin commented Jun 16, 2016

Merging in 2.0.

@rxin rxin closed this Jun 16, 2016
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 16, 2016
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch renames various Parquet support classes from CatalystAbc to ParquetAbc. This new naming makes more sense for two reasons:

1. These are not optimizer related (i.e. Catalyst) classes.
2. We are in the Spark code base, and as a result it'd be more clear to call out these are Parquet support classes, rather than some Spark classes.

## How was this patch tested?
Renamed test cases as well.

Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>

Closes #13700 from rxin/parquet-rename-branch-2.0.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants