Skip to content

Conversation

@jacek-lewandowski
Copy link
Contributor

...ationInfo is initialized properly after deserialization

…licationInfo is initialized properly after deserialization
@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor

test this please

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

minor: no space before colon

@andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM. I verified that this is the same as before I removed it.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 13, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 1922. This patch merges cleanly.
View progress: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18450/consoleFull

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 13, 2014

QA results for PR 1922:
- This patch PASSES unit tests.
- This patch merges cleanly
- This patch adds no public classes

For more information see test ouptut:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18450/consoleFull

@jacek-lewandowski
Copy link
Contributor Author

So what is the next step? Is it going to be included in 1.0.x?

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2014
…lic...

...ationInfo is initialized properly after deserialization

Author: Jacek Lewandowski <lewandowski.jacek@gmail.com>

Closes #1922 from jacek-lewandowski/branch-1.0 and squashes the following commits:

13c1fb3 [Jacek Lewandowski] SPARK-3009: Reverted readObject method in ApplicationInfo so that ApplicationInfo is initialized properly after deserialization
@andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks I've merged this.

@andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor

@jacek-lewandowski I realize this is only for branch-1.0. Could you also make the same PR for master?

@jacek-lewandowski
Copy link
Contributor Author

@andrewor14 - created #1947

@JoshRosen
Copy link
Contributor

@jacek-lewandowski do you mind closing this PR, since GitHub won't do it automatically? Thanks!

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 9b8c228 Aug 31, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants