Skip to content

Conversation

@jacek-lewandowski
Copy link
Contributor

...ationInfo is initialized properly after deserialization

…licationInfo is initialized properly after deserialization
@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

rxin commented Aug 14, 2014

Jenkins, test this please.

@andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor

test this please

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 14, 2014

QA tests have started for PR 1947. This patch merges cleanly.
View progress: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18565/consoleFull

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Aug 14, 2014

QA results for PR 1947:
- This patch PASSES unit tests.
- This patch merges cleanly
- This patch adds no public classes

For more information see test ouptut:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18565/consoleFull

@andrewor14
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks, I merged this into master and branch 1.1

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2014
…lic...

...ationInfo is initialized properly after deserialization

Author: Jacek Lewandowski <lewandowski.jacek@gmail.com>

Closes #1947 from jacek-lewandowski/master and squashes the following commits:

713b2f1 [Jacek Lewandowski] SPARK-3009: Reverted readObject method in ApplicationInfo so that ApplicationInfo is initialized properly after deserialization

(cherry picked from commit a75bc7a)
Signed-off-by: Andrew Or <andrewor14@gmail.com>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in a75bc7a Aug 14, 2014
xiliu82 pushed a commit to xiliu82/spark that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2014
…lic...

...ationInfo is initialized properly after deserialization

Author: Jacek Lewandowski <lewandowski.jacek@gmail.com>

Closes apache#1947 from jacek-lewandowski/master and squashes the following commits:

713b2f1 [Jacek Lewandowski] SPARK-3009: Reverted readObject method in ApplicationInfo so that ApplicationInfo is initialized properly after deserialization
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants