Skip to content

Conversation

@LinhongLiu
Copy link
Contributor

@LinhongLiu LinhongLiu commented Nov 28, 2019

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Follow up of #26134 to document the reason to add days filed and explain how do we use it

Why are the changes needed?

only comment

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

no

How was this patch tested?

no need test

@LinhongLiu
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @zsxwing @xuanyuanking

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Previous -> Previously,
has -> had
Nit: I don't know if it matters to talk about the previous implementation. A note about why days exist is fine.
Frankly it might also be worth a note about why months exists at all (they are also not units of time with a constant length, unlike hours, minutes, seconds)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@srowen thanks for your suggestion, I changed another way to note about the reason. Could you review again?

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Nov 29, 2019

Test build #4949 has finished for PR 26701 at commit 114eb37.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@srowen srowen closed this in f22177c Nov 30, 2019
@srowen
Copy link
Member

srowen commented Nov 30, 2019

Merged to master

attilapiros pushed a commit to attilapiros/spark that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2019
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Follow up of apache#26134 to document the reason to add days filed and explain how do we use it

### Why are the changes needed?
only comment

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
no

### How was this patch tested?
no need test

Closes apache#26701 from LinhongLiu/spark-29486-followup.

Authored-by: Liu,Linhong <liulinhong@baidu.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Owen <sean.owen@databricks.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants