Skip to content

Conversation

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun commented May 7, 2024

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a follow-up of #46430 to fix Python linter failure.

Why are the changes needed?

To recover branch-3.5 CI,

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

Pass Python Linter in this PR builder.

Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No.

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun changed the title [SPARK-48167][PYTHON][TESTS][FOLLOWUP] Reformat test_readwriter.py to fix Python Linter error [SPARK-48167][PYTHON][TESTS][FOLLOWUP][3.5] Reformat test_readwriter.py to fix Python Linter error May 7, 2024
@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member Author

cc @HyukjinKwon and @zhengruifeng

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member Author

Could you review this PR, @gengliangwang ?

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you, @gengliangwang !

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member Author

Python Linter passed and the doc generation issue is different one.

Merged to branch-3.5.

dongjoon-hyun added a commit that referenced this pull request May 7, 2024
…py to fix Python Linter error

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is a follow-up of #46430 to fix Python linter failure.

### Why are the changes needed?

To recover `branch-3.5` CI,
- https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/8981228745/job/24666400664

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

Pass Python Linter in this PR builder.

### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No.

Closes #46445 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-48167.

Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dhyun@apple.com>
@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun deleted the SPARK-48167 branch May 7, 2024 20:40
@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants