Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Rename app-viewers to widgets-blocks #37553

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

sharat87
Copy link
Member

@sharat87 sharat87 commented Nov 19, 2024

shot-2024-11-19-08-08-13

Communication

Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?

  • Yes
  • No

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated ownership assignments for various directories related to widget functionality, transferring responsibilities from @appsmithorg/app-viewers to @appsmithorg/widgets-blocks.

@sharat87 sharat87 requested review from a team and AnaghHegde and removed request for a team November 19, 2024 08:08
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates to the CODEOWNERS file, specifically reassigning ownership of several directories and files related to widget functionality. The ownership for paths previously managed by @appsmithorg/app-viewers has been transferred to @appsmithorg/widgets-blocks. Existing ownership assignments for other components remain unchanged, ensuring continuity in oversight for various service and feature flag files.

Changes

File/Directory Path Change Summary
app/client/src/widgets/* Ownership reassigned from @appsmithorg/app-viewers to @appsmithorg/widgets-blocks
app/client/src/components/propertyControls/* Ownership reassigned from @appsmithorg/app-viewers to @appsmithorg/widgets-blocks
app/client/src/sagas/OneClickBindingSaga.ts Ownership reassigned from @appsmithorg/app-viewers to @appsmithorg/widgets-blocks
app/client/src/WidgetQueryGenerators/* Ownership reassigned from @appsmithorg/app-viewers to @appsmithorg/widgets-blocks
app/client/src/components/editorComponents/WidgetQueryGeneratorForm/* Ownership reassigned from @appsmithorg/app-viewers to @appsmithorg/widgets-blocks
app/client/src/pages/AppViewer/* Ownership reassigned from @appsmithorg/app-viewers to @appsmithorg/widgets-blocks
app/server/* and app/client/* Existing ownership assignments retained for various components

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

skip-changelog

Poem

In the land of code where widgets play,
Ownership shifts in a merry ballet.
From viewers to blocks, the teams align,
Keeping the structure, all will be fine.
With each new path, a clear guide we weave,
In the world of code, we all believe! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog label Nov 19, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5ec2ff1 and c8df9ab.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • CODEOWNERS (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
CODEOWNERS (1)

31-31: Verify ownership overlap with UI Builders Pod.

There appears to be an overlap in ownership for the propertyControls directory:

  • Line 31: app/client/src/components/propertyControls/*@appsmithorg/widgets-blocks
  • Line 89: app/client/src/components/propertyControls/*@appsmithorg/anvil-team

Please clarify the intended ownership for this directory.

Also applies to: 89-89

Comment on lines +30 to +35
app/client/src/widgets/* @appsmithorg/widgets-blocks
app/client/src/components/propertyControls/* @appsmithorg/widgets-blocks
app/client/src/sagas/OneClickBindingSaga.ts @appsmithorg/widgets-blocks
app/client/src/WidgetQueryGenerators/* @appsmithorg/widgets-blocks
app/client/src/components/editorComponents/WidgetQueryGeneratorForm/* @appsmithorg/widgets-blocks
app/client/src/pages/AppViewer/* @appsmithorg/widgets-blocks
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

⚠️ Ownership conflicts detected in CODEOWNERS file

There are overlapping ownership assignments that need to be resolved:

  • app/client/src/widgets/* has conflicting ownership:

    • Line 30: @appsmithorg/widgets-blocks
    • Lines 87-92: @appsmithorg/anvil-team (specific files)
    • Line 24: @appsmithorg/wds-team & @appsmithorg/anvil-team (wds subdirectory)
  • app/client/src/components/propertyControls/* has conflicting ownership:

    • Line 31: @appsmithorg/widgets-blocks
    • Line 59: @appsmithorg/anvil-team

Please clarify the ownership hierarchy and resolve these conflicts to prevent confusion in code review assignments.

🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM! Ownership reassignment is consistent with PR objectives.

The ownership transfer from @appsmithorg/app-viewers to @appsmithorg/widgets-blocks is properly implemented for all widget-related paths.

Let's verify there are no ownership conflicts with other teams:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for paths that might have multiple owners

# Test: Look for duplicate path definitions
rg -n "^app/client/src/widgets/\*" CODEOWNERS
rg -n "^app/client/src/components/propertyControls/\*" CODEOWNERS
rg -n "^app/client/src/pages/AppViewer/\*" CODEOWNERS

Length of output: 4973


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check for ownership conflicts
# 1. Get all lines containing the paths we're interested in
grep -n "app/client/src/widgets\|app/client/src/components/propertyControls\|app/client/src/pages/AppViewer" CODEOWNERS

# 2. Also check for any other team assignments in these directories
grep -n "widgets-blocks\|app-viewers" CODEOWNERS

Length of output: 1358

@sharat87 sharat87 mentioned this pull request Nov 19, 2024
2 tasks
@sharat87 sharat87 merged commit 1529225 into release Nov 20, 2024
17 checks passed
@sharat87 sharat87 deleted the sharat87-patch-3 branch November 20, 2024 05:03
This was referenced Jan 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants