Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Update CODEOWNERS #38514

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2025
Merged

chore: Update CODEOWNERS #38514

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 7, 2025

Conversation

nidhi-nair
Copy link
Contributor

@nidhi-nair nidhi-nair commented Jan 7, 2025

Description

Tip

Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team).

Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR.

Fixes #Issue Number
or
Fixes Issue URL

Warning

If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid.

Automation

/ok-to-test tags=""

🔍 Cypress test results

Caution

If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt the CI result for your PR.

Communication

Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?

  • Yes
  • No

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated CODEOWNERS file to clarify ownership patterns
    • Added new ownership entry for environment-related files
    • Removed outdated ownership entries for various server-side components

@nidhi-nair nidhi-nair requested a review from riteshkew January 7, 2025 06:00
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the CODEOWNERS file by updating ownership patterns for server-related files. A new entry is added to specify that files matching app/server/**/*Environment* are now owned by @appsmithorg/git-be-reviewers. Several previous entries related to the Data Platform Pod are removed, streamlining the ownership structure and consolidating file ownership assignments.

Changes

File Change Summary
CODEOWNERS - Added new ownership entry for Environment files
- Added clarifying comment about Globstar paths
- Removed previous ownership entries for Actions, Datasources, OAuth2, Authentication, and Environment files

Suggested labels

skip-changelog

Suggested reviewers

  • AnaghHegde

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🔍 Code ownership shifts like sand,
Globstar paths now take their stand
Reviewers change, patterns realign
In GitLab's collaborative design
A dance of code, both old and new! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a75c530 and d0e5e2f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • CODEOWNERS (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
CODEOWNERS (2)

4-4: LGTM! Good documentation practice.

The added comment with GitLab documentation reference helps future maintainers understand the Globstar path patterns.


104-105: Verify coverage of Environment files.

The ownership transfer from individuals to the git-be-reviewers team looks good. Let's verify all Environment files are covered by this pattern.

✅ Verification successful

Pattern appears to be correctly scoped to Environment permission files

The pattern app/server/**/*Environment* covers all Environment permission-related files. Other files containing "environment" appear to be intentionally under different ownership as they serve different purposes (configuration, services, etc.).

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all Environment-related files are covered by the new pattern

# Find all files containing "Environment" in their name under app/server
echo "Files that will be owned by git-be-reviewers:"
fd "Environment" "app/server"

# Double-check if we might have missed any environment-related files with different naming
echo -e "\nPotential environment-related files that might need review:"
rg -l "(?i)environment" "app/server" | grep -v "Environment"

Length of output: 11864


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog label Jan 7, 2025
@nidhi-nair nidhi-nair merged commit 58850c3 into release Jan 7, 2025
17 checks passed
@nidhi-nair nidhi-nair deleted the nidhi-nair-patch-1 branch January 7, 2025 06:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants