feat: git mod - updating redux slice and adding pending actions #37830
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a series of new actions and modifications to existing actions within the Git client application, focusing on state management for various Git operations. New actions are added for checkout, creation, deletion, and fetching of branches, as well as handling configurations and SSH keys. The state structure is updated to centralize responses under Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
github-actions
bot
added
Git Product
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (42)
app/client/packages/git/src/types.ts (2)
17-28: Consider defining specific interfaces for better type safetyDefining types like
GitMergeStatus,GitGlobalConfig,GitLocalConfig,GitProtectedBranches,GitAutocommitProgress, andGitSSHKeyasRecord<string, unknown>provides minimal type safety. For improved maintainability and error checking, consider defining explicit interfaces that match the expected structure of these entities.
35-38: Reuse existing types with utility typesInstead of creating a new
AsyncStateWithoutValueinterface, you could useOmit<AsyncState, "value">to exclude thevalueproperty. This promotes code reuse and keeps the type definitions DRY.app/client/packages/git/src/enums.ts (2)
1-5: Consider adding JSDoc comments for better documentation.The enum is well-structured, but adding JSDoc comments would improve maintainability by documenting the purpose of each artifact type.
+/** + * Types of Git artifacts that can be managed in the system. + */ export enum GitArtifactType { + /** Application-level Git artifact */ application = "application", + /** Package-level Git artifact */ package = "package", + /** Workflow-level Git artifact */ workflow = "workflow", }
7-17: Consider consolidating identical step enums.
GitConnectStepandGitImportStephave identical values. While keeping them separate provides better type safety, consider if a single enum with a more generic name would suffice.-export enum GitConnectStep { - provider = "provider", - remote = "remote", - ssh = "ssh", -} - -export enum GitImportStep { - provider = "provider", - remote = "remote", - ssh = "ssh", -} +/** + * Steps involved in Git repository operations (connect/import) + */ +export enum GitRepositoryStep { + provider = "provider", + remote = "remote", + ssh = "ssh", +} + +// Use type aliases for specific contexts if needed +export type GitConnectStep = GitRepositoryStep; +export type GitImportStep = GitRepositoryStep;app/client/packages/git/src/actions/pullActions.ts (1)
12-12: Consider clearing error state on success.Success handlers should reset error states to maintain consistency.
export const pullSuccessAction = createSingleArtifactAction((state) => { state.apiResponses.pull.loading = false; + state.apiResponses.pull.error = null; return state; });app/client/packages/git/src/actions/commitActions.ts (1)
21-22: Consider enhancing error typingWhile the error handling is correct, consider using a more specific error type instead of just
stringfor better error handling across the application.- (state, action: GitArtifactPayloadAction<{ error: string }>) => { + (state, action: GitArtifactPayloadAction<{ error: GitErrorType }>) => {app/client/packages/git/src/actions/mergeActions.ts (3)
4-9: Consider adding explicit return type annotation.The action follows good practices but could benefit from type safety improvements.
-export const mergeInitAction = createSingleArtifactAction((state) => { +export const mergeInitAction = createSingleArtifactAction((state): typeof state => {
11-15: Consider explicitly resetting error state on success.For consistency with error handling patterns, consider explicitly setting error to null on success.
export const mergeSuccessAction = createSingleArtifactAction((state) => { state.apiResponses.merge.loading = false; + state.apiResponses.merge.error = null; return state; });
17-26: Consider using a more specific error type.Using a generic string for errors might lose valuable type information. Consider creating a specific error type or using Error object.
- (state, action: GitArtifactPayloadAction<{ error: string }>) => { + (state, action: GitArtifactPayloadAction<{ error: Error | string }>) => {app/client/packages/git/src/actions/discardActions.ts (1)
11-15: Consider clearing error state on successWhile the implementation is correct, consider explicitly setting error to null on success for consistency with the init action.
export const discardSuccessAction = createSingleArtifactAction((state) => { state.apiResponses.discard.loading = false; + state.apiResponses.discard.error = null; return state; });app/client/packages/git/src/actions/disconnectActions.ts (3)
4-9: Consider adding type safety for state parameterThe state parameter in the callback function should be typed to ensure type safety and better IDE support.
-export const disconnectInitAction = createSingleArtifactAction((state) => { +export const disconnectInitAction = createSingleArtifactAction((state: GitState) => {
11-15: Consider clearing error state on successWhile the action correctly sets loading to false, consider also clearing the error state to maintain consistency.
export const disconnectSuccessAction = createSingleArtifactAction((state: GitState) => { state.apiResponses.disconnect.loading = false; + state.apiResponses.disconnect.error = null; return state; });
17-26: Consider using a more specific error typeThe error payload could benefit from a more specific type than just string. Consider creating a custom error type or using a standard error interface.
- (state, action: GitArtifactPayloadAction<{ error: string }>) => { + (state, action: GitArtifactPayloadAction<{ error: GitError }>) => {Where
GitErrorcould be:interface GitError { message: string; code?: string; details?: unknown; }app/client/packages/git/src/actions/createBranchActions.ts (3)
4-9: Remove redundant state returnSince Redux Toolkit uses Immer, the state return is unnecessary when mutating state directly.
export const createBranchInitAction = createSingleArtifactAction((state) => { state.apiResponses.createBranch.loading = true; state.apiResponses.createBranch.error = null; - - return state; });
11-15: Remove redundant state returnSimilar to the init action, the state return is unnecessary here.
export const createBranchSuccessAction = createSingleArtifactAction((state) => { state.apiResponses.createBranch.loading = false; - - return state; });
17-26: Well-typed error handling, but contains redundant state returnThe error handling and typing are well implemented, but the state return can be removed.
export const createBranchErrorAction = createSingleArtifactAction( (state, action: GitArtifactPayloadAction<{ error: string }>) => { const { error } = action.payload; state.apiResponses.createBranch.loading = false; state.apiResponses.createBranch.error = error; - - return state; }, );app/client/packages/git/src/actions/deleteBranchActions.ts (3)
4-9: Add type annotation for state parameter.The state parameter in the callback function should be explicitly typed for better type safety and documentation.
-export const deleteBranchInitAction = createSingleArtifactAction((state) => { +export const deleteBranchInitAction = createSingleArtifactAction((state: GitState) => {
11-15: Consider improvements to success action.Two suggestions:
- Add type annotation for state parameter
- Consider clearing error state on success for consistency
-export const deleteBranchSuccessAction = createSingleArtifactAction((state) => { +export const deleteBranchSuccessAction = createSingleArtifactAction((state: GitState) => { state.apiResponses.deleteBranch.loading = false; + state.apiResponses.deleteBranch.error = null; return state; });
17-26: Add state type annotation for consistency.The error action properly types the action parameter but should also type the state parameter.
export const deleteBranchErrorAction = createSingleArtifactAction( - (state, action: GitArtifactPayloadAction<{ error: string }>) => { + (state: GitState, action: GitArtifactPayloadAction<{ error: string }>) => {app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchStatusActions.ts (1)
Line range hint
19-28: Consider using a more specific error typeWhile the implementation is correct, consider defining a specific error type instead of using a generic string for better error handling and type safety.
- GitArtifactPayloadAction<{ error: string }> + GitArtifactPayloadAction<{ error: GitStatusError }>Where
GitStatusErrorcould be:type GitStatusError = { code: string; message: string; details?: unknown; };app/client/packages/git/src/actions/checkoutBranchActions.ts (2)
4-9: Add type safety to state parameterConsider adding explicit type for the state parameter to ensure type safety and better IDE support.
-export const checkoutBranchInitAction = createSingleArtifactAction((state) => { +export const checkoutBranchInitAction = createSingleArtifactAction((state: GitState) => {
19-28: Consider normalizing error handlingThe error handling looks good, but consider normalizing the error message for consistency across different error scenarios.
(state, action: GitArtifactPayloadAction<{ error: string }>) => { const { error } = action.payload; + const normalizedError = error?.trim() || "Unknown error occurred"; state.apiResponses.checkoutBranch.loading = false; - state.apiResponses.checkoutBranch.error = error; + state.apiResponses.checkoutBranch.error = normalizedError;app/client/packages/git/src/actions/generateSSHKey.ts (1)
1-28: Consider implementing action constants and action creatorsTo align with Redux best practices and the objectives in issue #36810, consider:
- Defining action type constants
- Creating typed action creators
- Adding selector functions for the SSH key state
This would improve type safety and reusability.
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/helpers/createSingleArtifactAction.ts (1)
6-6: LGTM! Good architectural decision to centralize the initial state.Centralizing the initial state in a separate file improves maintainability and reduces duplication. The use of Immer in Redux Toolkit ensures this approach is safe from shared mutable state issues.
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchBranchesActions.ts (1)
24-25: Consider improving error type safety.While the error handling is functional, consider using a more specific error type instead of a generic string.
- (state, action: GitArtifactPayloadAction<{ error: string }>) => { + (state, action: GitArtifactPayloadAction<{ error: GitError }>) => {This would provide better type safety and consistent error handling across the application.
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchMetadataActions.ts (1)
24-25: Consider using a specific error typeWhile the implementation is correct, consider defining a specific error type instead of using string for better type safety and consistency.
- (state, action: GitArtifactPayloadAction<{ error: string }>) => { + (state, action: GitArtifactPayloadAction<{ error: GitMetadataError }>) => {app/client/packages/git/src/actions/toggleAutocommitActions.ts (2)
21-30: Consider enhancing error handling robustnessWhile the implementation is correct, consider adding error normalization to ensure consistent error messages across the application.
export const toggleAutocommitErrorAction = createSingleArtifactAction( (state, action: GitArtifactPayloadAction<{ error: string }>) => { - const { error } = action.payload; + const { error: rawError } = action.payload; + const error = typeof rawError === 'string' ? rawError : 'An unknown error occurred'; state.apiResponses.toggleAutocommit.loading = false; state.apiResponses.toggleAutocommit.error = error;
1-30: Consider standardizing action naming patternsThe current naming pattern
toggleAutocommit{Init|Success|Error}Actionis good, but consider aligning with Redux Toolkit's convention of using present tense verbs (e.g.,toggleAutocommit,toggleAutocommitSucceeded,toggleAutocommitFailed) if you plan to migrate to RTK in the future.app/client/packages/git/src/actions/triggerAutocommitActions.ts (1)
4-11: Add type safety for state parameterConsider adding explicit type for the state parameter to ensure type safety and better IDE support.
- (state) => { + (state: GitState) => {app/client/packages/git/src/actions/updateLocalConfigActions.ts (2)
13-19: Consider clearing error state on successWhile the action correctly sets loading to false, consider clearing the error state as well to maintain consistency with the init action.
export const updateLocalConfigSuccessAction = createSingleArtifactAction( (state) => { state.apiResponses.updateLocalConfig.loading = false; + state.apiResponses.updateLocalConfig.error = null; return state; }, );
4-30: Add JSDoc comments for better documentationConsider adding JSDoc comments to describe the purpose and payload structure of each action. This would improve maintainability and developer experience.
Example:
/** * Initializes the local Git config update process. * Resets error state and sets loading to true. */ export const updateLocalConfigInitAction = ...app/client/packages/git/src/actions/updateGlobalConfigActions.ts (1)
13-19: Consider clearing error state in success actionThe success action should clear any previous error state to maintain consistency.
export const updateGlobalConfigSuccessAction = createSingleArtifactAction( (state) => { state.apiResponses.updateGlobalConfig.loading = false; + state.apiResponses.updateGlobalConfig.error = null; return state; }, );app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchSSHKeyActions.ts (2)
11-18: Consider adding payload validationWhile the action is well-typed, consider adding runtime validation for the SSH key structure to ensure data integrity.
export const fetchSSHKeySuccessAction = createSingleArtifactAction( (state, action: GitArtifactPayloadAction<{ sshKey: GitSSHKey }>) => { + if (!action.payload.sshKey) { + console.warn('Received empty SSH key in success action'); + } state.apiResponses.sshKey.loading = false; state.apiResponses.sshKey.value = action.payload.sshKey;
20-29: Consider standardizing error typesConsider using a standardized error type instead of a plain string to maintain consistency across the application's error handling.
- (state, action: GitArtifactPayloadAction<{ error: string }>) => { + (state, action: GitArtifactPayloadAction<{ error: GitErrorType }>) => {app/client/packages/git/src/actions/updateProtectedBranchesActions.ts (1)
4-11: Consider adding type safety for state access.While the action logic is correct, consider adding type safety for the state structure to prevent potential runtime errors.
- (state) => { + (state: GitState) => {app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchMergeStatusActions.ts (1)
25-34: Consider using a typed error interfaceWhile the implementation is correct, consider using a more specific error type instead of a generic string.
- (state, action: GitArtifactPayloadAction<{ error: string }>) => { + (state, action: GitArtifactPayloadAction<{ error: GitError }>) => {app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchGlobalConfigActions.ts (1)
25-34: Consider using a more specific error typeWhile the implementation is correct, consider using a more specific error type instead of just string.
- (state, action: GitArtifactPayloadAction<{ error: string }>) => { + (state, action: GitArtifactPayloadAction<{ error: GitError }>) => {app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchProtectedBranchesActions.ts (2)
4-11: Add type annotation for state parameterThe implementation is correct, but adding a type annotation would improve type safety and code clarity.
- (state) => { + (state: GitState) => {
13-26: Consider simplifying the value assignmentThe implementation is correct, but the multi-line assignment could be more concise.
- state.apiResponses.protectedBranches.value = - action.payload.protectedBranches; + state.apiResponses.protectedBranches.value = action.payload.protectedBranches;app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchAutocommitProgressActions.ts (2)
4-11: Add type annotation for state parameterWhile the code is functionally correct, adding a type annotation for the state parameter would improve type safety and code clarity.
- (state) => { + (state: GitState) => {
28-37: Consider simplifying error handlingThe error handling can be simplified by removing the intermediate variable since it's only used once.
- const { error } = action.payload; - state.apiResponses.autocommitProgress.loading = false; - state.apiResponses.autocommitProgress.error = error; + state.apiResponses.autocommitProgress.error = action.payload.error;app/client/packages/git/src/actions/helpers/singleArtifactInitialState.ts (1)
13-33: Consider creating a reusable modal state type.The modal states share common properties like
open. Consider extracting this pattern into a reusable type.+type BaseModalState = { + open: boolean; +}; + +type SteppedModalState = BaseModalState & { + step: GitConnectStep | GitImportStep; +}; + +type TabbedModalState = BaseModalState & { + tab: GitOpsTab | GitSettingsTab; +}; + const gitSingleArtifactInitialUIState: GitSingleArtifactUIReduxState = { - connectModal: { - open: false, - step: GitConnectStep.provider, - }, + connectModal: SteppedModalState = { + open: false, + step: GitConnectStep.provider, + }, // Apply similar changes to other modal states
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (29)
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/checkoutBranchActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/commitActions.ts(2 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/connectActions.ts(2 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/createBranchActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/deleteBranchActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/discardActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/disconnectActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchAutocommitProgressActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchBranchesActions.ts(2 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchGlobalConfigActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchLocalConfigActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchMergeStatusActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchMetadataActions.ts(2 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchProtectedBranchesActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchSSHKeyActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchStatusActions.ts(2 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/generateSSHKey.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/helpers/createSingleArtifactAction.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/helpers/singleArtifactInitialState.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/mergeActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/mountActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/pullActions.ts(2 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/toggleAutocommitActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/triggerAutocommitActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/updateGlobalConfigActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/updateLocalConfigActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/updateProtectedBranchesActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/enums.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/types.ts(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- app/client/packages/git/src/actions/mountActions.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (3)
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/createBranchActions.ts (1)
Learnt from: brayn003
PR: appsmithorg/appsmith#36989
File: app/client/packages/git/src/actions/helpers/createSingleArtifactAction.ts:12-41
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T08:11:25.416Z
Learning: In Redux Toolkit (TypeScript), since it uses Immer internally, assigning the same initial state object across artifacts does not lead to shared mutable state issues.
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/helpers/createSingleArtifactAction.ts (1)
Learnt from: brayn003
PR: appsmithorg/appsmith#36989
File: app/client/packages/git/src/actions/helpers/createSingleArtifactAction.ts:12-41
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T08:11:25.416Z
Learning: In Redux Toolkit (TypeScript), since it uses Immer internally, assigning the same initial state object across artifacts does not lead to shared mutable state issues.
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/helpers/singleArtifactInitialState.ts (1)
Learnt from: brayn003
PR: appsmithorg/appsmith#36989
File: app/client/packages/git/src/actions/helpers/createSingleArtifactAction.ts:12-41
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T08:11:25.416Z
Learning: In Redux Toolkit (TypeScript), since it uses Immer internally, assigning the same initial state object across artifacts does not lead to shared mutable state issues.
🔇 Additional comments (66)
app/client/packages/git/src/types.ts (1)
97-97: Good use of keyof for enum-based typing
Updating artifactType to keyof typeof GitArtifactType enhances type safety by ensuring that only valid keys from the GitArtifactType enum are used.
app/client/packages/git/src/enums.ts (1)
19-27: LGTM!
The tab enums are well-defined and follow consistent naming patterns.
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/pullActions.ts (2)
21-22: LGTM! Error handling implementation is solid.
The error handling logic is well-typed and follows Redux patterns.
5-6: LGTM! Verify state path migration completeness.
The state initialization logic is correct and follows Redux patterns.
Let's verify all pull-related state references have been migrated:
✅ Verification successful
State path migration is complete and consistent
Based on the codebase analysis:
- All pull-related state references are properly nested under
apiResponses - The state structure is correctly defined in types.ts
- No legacy direct
state.pullreferences were found - Actions are consistently using the new state path
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining direct references to state.pull
rg "state\.pull\." --type ts
Length of output: 30
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to find any pull-related state references
rg "pull" --type ts -A 2 -B 2 app/client/packages/git/src/
Length of output: 3875
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for state references in selectors or reducers
fd "selector|reducer" --type f --extension ts --exec rg -l "pull"
Length of output: 120
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any Redux state interfaces or types defining pull
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
pull
$$$
}'
Length of output: 2144
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the gitSyncReducer that was found for any direct state.pull references
rg "state\.pull\." -A 2 -B 2 ./app/client/src/reducers/uiReducers/gitSyncReducer.ts
Length of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any pull-related selectors
rg "select.*pull" --type ts app/client/
Length of output: 41
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/commitActions.ts (2)
5-6: LGTM! Clean initialization of loading and error states
The state initialization follows Redux best practices by properly setting loading state and clearing previous errors.
12-12: Verify error state persistence
The success action correctly updates the loading state. However, let's verify that error states are properly handled across the commit flow.
✅ Verification successful
Error states are properly handled
The commit flow has complete error state management:
commitInitAction: Clears error state and sets loadingcommitSuccessAction: Resets loading state onlycommitErrorAction: Sets error message and resets loading
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistent error state handling across commit-related actions
ast-grep --pattern 'state.apiResponses.commit.error = $_'
Length of output: 257
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the full context of the commit actions to understand the error handling flow
rg -A 10 "commit.*Action" app/client/packages/git/src/actions/commitActions.ts
Length of output: 689
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/connectActions.ts (3)
5-6: LGTM! Clean state initialization pattern.
The state initialization under apiResponses.connect follows the centralized state management pattern correctly.
12-12: LGTM! Proper success state handling.
Success state update is concise and maintains the expected state structure.
21-22: LGTM! Error handling follows best practices.
Error state management properly updates both loading and error states under the new namespace.
Let's verify the consistent usage of this pattern across other files:
✅ Verification successful
Error handling pattern is consistently implemented across all Git action files
The verification shows that all Git action files follow the same error handling pattern, consistently updating both loading and error states under their respective namespaces in the state object. This includes all operations like connect, disconnect, commit, merge, pull, and branch management.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent error handling pattern across action files
# Expected: All error actions should follow similar pattern of updating both loading and error states
ast-grep --pattern 'createSingleArtifactAction(
($_, action: GitArtifactPayloadAction<$_>) => {
$$$
state.apiResponses.$_.loading = false;
state.apiResponses.$_.error = $_;
$$$
}
)'
Length of output: 22711
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/mergeActions.ts (2)
1-2: LGTM! Clean imports with proper type imports.
1-26: Verify integration with other Redux slices.
The implementation aligns with PR objectives, but let's verify the consistency of the merge actions with other Git operations.
✅ Verification successful
Implementation follows consistent Redux pattern
The merge actions follow the same pattern as other Git operations in the codebase, using createSingleArtifactAction and maintaining consistent state management for loading/error states. The implementation is properly integrated with the Redux store structure.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistent patterns across other action files
rg -g "*.ts" "createSingleArtifactAction.*apiResponses\." app/client/packages/git/src/actions/
Length of output: 96
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for similar action patterns in the git package
rg -g "*.ts" "apiResponses\." app/client/packages/git/src/
# Also check for other action files to understand the pattern
fd -e ts . app/client/packages/git/src/actions/ --exec head -n 30 {}
Length of output: 37557
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/discardActions.ts (3)
1-2: LGTM! Clean and focused imports.
17-26: LGTM! Well-structured error handling.
The error action is properly typed and handles the state updates correctly.
4-9: Verify state shape for apiResponses.discard
The implementation looks correct, but let's verify the state shape is properly defined in the reducer.
✅ Verification successful
State shape is properly defined and implementation is correct
The state shape for apiResponses.discard is properly defined in the GitSingleArtifactAPIResponsesReduxState interface as AsyncStateWithoutValue, which matches the implementation in the reviewed code:
loading: booleanerror: string | null
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the state shape definition for apiResponses.discard
# Search for the state interface or type definition
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $STATE {
apiResponses: {
$$$
discard: {
$$$
}
$$$
}
}'
# Backup: Search for any mentions of apiResponses.discard structure
rg -A 5 "apiResponses.discard"
Length of output: 1609
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for the state interface definition and initial state
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $STATE {
$$$
}'
# Also search for initial state setup
ast-grep --pattern 'const initialState = {
$$$
}'
# Backup: Search for state type definitions
rg "type.*State.*=" -A 5
Length of output: 101094
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for the initial state setup in the git package
rg "initialState.*=.*{" app/client/packages/git/src/ -A 10
# Also search for state type definitions in the git package
rg "type.*State.*=|interface.*State.*{" app/client/packages/git/src/ -A 10
Length of output: 369
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for state type definitions and initial state in git package with fixed regex
rg "type.*State" app/client/packages/git/src/
rg "interface.*State" app/client/packages/git/src/
rg "initialState" app/client/packages/git/src/
Length of output: 1156
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the state types and implementation
cat app/client/packages/git/src/types.ts
cat app/client/packages/git/src/store/gitArtifactSlice.ts
Length of output: 4962
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/disconnectActions.ts (2)
1-3: LGTM! Clean and focused imports.
1-26: Verify alignment with design document
The implementation follows Redux patterns and centralizes state under apiResponses. Please verify that this structure aligns with the design document mentioned in the PR objectives.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the state management pattern across files to ensure consistency.
Implementation follows consistent Redux state management pattern
The code follows a consistent pattern across all Git-related actions in the codebase, where each API operation maintains its state under apiResponses with standard loading, error, and value properties. The implementation in disconnectActions.ts perfectly aligns with this established pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar patterns in other files to ensure consistency
rg -l "apiResponses\." --type ts
Length of output: 1479
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the pattern of state management in other files
rg "apiResponses\." -A 3 --type ts app/client/packages/git/src/actions/
Length of output: 29479
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the initial state structure
rg "initialState" -A 10 --type ts app/client/packages/git/src/
Length of output: 1388
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for any design or documentation files
fd -e md . app/client/packages/git/
Length of output: 37
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/createBranchActions.ts (1)
1-3: LGTM! Clean and specific imports.
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/deleteBranchActions.ts (2)
1-3: LGTM! Clean and focused imports.
1-26: Verify integration with delete branch workflow.
The actions implementation looks solid and follows the standard Redux pattern. To ensure complete integration:
- Verify these actions are properly connected to the delete branch thunk/saga
- Ensure the state shape matches the reducer's initial state
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchStatusActions.ts (3)
Line range hint 1-2: LGTM! Good use of helper and type safety
The use of createSingleArtifactAction helper ensures consistent state management patterns, and proper typing with GitArtifactPayloadAction maintains type safety.
11-17: LGTM! Clean success action implementation
The success action properly handles the loading state and updates the status value with appropriate type safety.
4-8: Verify consistent usage of new state path
The state path change to apiResponses.status looks good, but let's verify this pattern is consistently applied across related files.
✅ Verification successful
State path apiResponses.status is consistently used
All occurrences of the state path show the new pattern state.apiResponses.status and there are no instances of direct state.status access, confirming consistent usage across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining direct status state access that might have been missed
rg -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' 'state\.status\.' --type-add 'ts:*.ts' --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx'
# Search for the new pattern to confirm consistent usage
rg -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' 'state\.apiResponses\.status\.' --type-add 'ts:*.ts' --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx'
Length of output: 823
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/checkoutBranchActions.ts (2)
1-2: LGTM! Clean imports following good practices.
1-28: Verify integration with other Git actions
Let's ensure consistent state management across Git operations.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try to verify the integration with other Git actions by searching for similar patterns and files in the same directory. This will help determine if the state management is consistent across Git operations.
Based on the search results, I can now provide a definitive response about the Git actions integration:
State management is consistent across Git operations
The code follows the same pattern used by all other Git actions in the codebase, with consistent state management through apiResponses and the same action structure using createSingleArtifactAction. The implementation matches other Git operations like merge, pull, commit, etc.
The verification shows:
- Same loading/error state management pattern
- Consistent use of
createSingleArtifactActionhelper - Aligned with other Git action files in the same directory
- Proper error handling following the established pattern
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistent state management patterns across Git actions
rg -t typescript "state\.apiResponses\." "app/client/packages/git/src/actions/"
# Verify all Git actions follow similar pattern
ast-grep --pattern 'export const $_ = createSingleArtifactAction'
Length of output: 142075
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistent state management patterns across Git actions
rg -g "*.ts" "state\.apiResponses\." "app/client/packages/git/src/actions/"
# Verify all Git actions follow similar pattern
ast-grep --pattern 'export const $_ = createSingleArtifactAction'
# Check for other Git action files in the same directory
fd -e ts . "app/client/packages/git/src/actions/"
Length of output: 156593
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/generateSSHKey.ts (4)
1-2: LGTM! Clean and focused imports.
19-28: LGTM! Well-structured error handling.
The error action properly handles the error state with appropriate typing.
4-9: Verify state path initialization
The code assumes state.apiResponses.generateSSHKey exists. We should verify this path is properly initialized in the reducer's initial state.
✅ Verification successful
State path is properly initialized
The generateSSHKey state path is correctly initialized in gitSingleArtifactInitialAPIResponses with the expected structure:
generateSSHKey: {
loading: false,
error: null,
}🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for initial state definition
ast-grep --pattern 'const initialState = {
$$$
apiResponses: {
$$$
generateSSHKey: {
$$$
}
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 135
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for initial state and generateSSHKey
rg -l "initialState.*generateSSHKey" --type ts
# Search for any state definition related to generateSSHKey
rg "generateSSHKey.*=.*{" --type ts -A 3
# Look for reducer or state files in the git package
fd "reducer|state" --type f --extension ts --base-directory app/client/packages/git/src
Length of output: 331
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the singleArtifactInitialState helper
cat app/client/packages/git/src/actions/helpers/singleArtifactInitialState.ts
# Fix the regex for generateSSHKey search
rg "generateSSHKey.*=" --type ts
# Look for any state type definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ = {
$$$
apiResponses: {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 4072
11-17: Verify success action design
The success action only sets loading to false without handling any success payload. Should we store the generated SSH key in the state?
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the SSH key generation flow to understand if storing the key in the state is necessary.
Let me search for more context about the SSH key generation flow and state management.
From the search results, I can see there are two separate states for SSH keys:
generateSSHKey- tracks the generation API call status (loading/error)sshKey- stores the actual SSH key value and its fetch status
Let me check if there's a separate action that handles storing the generated key.
Let me try one more search to find how the generated key is handled in the codebase.
Success action design appears correct
The current implementation is appropriate. From the codebase structure, we can see there are two separate states:
generateSSHKey- tracks only the API operation statussshKey- dedicated state for storing the actual key value
The success action correctly handles just the loading state, as the key value is likely managed by the sshKey state through a separate fetch action, which follows a clean separation of concerns.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for SSH key usage in the codebase
rg -A 5 "generateSSHKeySuccessAction"
Length of output: 526
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for SSH key related state and actions
rg -A 10 "generateSSHKey" app/client/packages/git/src/
# Look for the API call implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'generateSSHKey = async $_'
Length of output: 145715
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for SSH key related state and API calls
rg -A 5 "sshKey|generateSSHKey" app/client/packages/git/src/
# Look for the API response type
rg -A 5 "interface.*SSHKey" app/client/packages/git/src/
Length of output: 5207
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for any code that handles the generated SSH key response
rg -A 10 "generateSSHKey.*success" app/client/packages/git/src/
Length of output: 65
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for the saga/effect that handles the SSH key generation
rg -A 10 "function.*generateSSHKey" app/client/packages/git/src/
# Also check for any API call implementations
rg -A 5 "generateSSHKey.*api" app/client/packages/git/src/
Length of output: 127
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/helpers/createSingleArtifactAction.ts (1)
Line range hint 6-31: Verify the imported initial state structure.
Let's ensure the imported initial state matches the GitSingleArtifactReduxState type definition.
✅ Verification successful
Initial state structure matches type definition perfectly
The gitSingleArtifactInitialState correctly implements the GitSingleArtifactReduxState interface with all required properties:
uiproperty matchesGitSingleArtifactUIReduxStatewith all modal states and their propertiesapiResponsesproperty matchesGitSingleArtifactAPIResponsesReduxStatewith all async states properly initialized
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the structure of gitSingleArtifactInitialState matches the type definition
# Find and display the type definition
ast-grep --pattern 'type GitSingleArtifactReduxState = {
$$$
}'
# Find and display the initial state structure
ast-grep --pattern 'export const gitSingleArtifactInitialState = {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 145
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the type definition and initial state
# Search for the type definition file
rg -l "GitSingleArtifactReduxState" --type ts
# Search for the initial state file
rg -l "gitSingleArtifactInitialState" --type ts
# Once we find the files, let's look at their content
rg "type GitSingleArtifactReduxState" -A 10 --type ts
rg "export const gitSingleArtifactInitialState" -A 10 --type ts
Length of output: 1068
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the type definition and its components
# Get the content of types.ts which has the main type definition
cat app/client/packages/git/src/types.ts
# Get the content of singleArtifactInitialState.ts to see both the type usage and initial state
cat app/client/packages/git/src/actions/helpers/singleArtifactInitialState.ts
Length of output: 5658
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchBranchesActions.ts (2)
13-14: LGTM! Success state handling is correct.
The success action properly updates both the loading state and branch data under the new state structure.
5-6: LGTM! Verify state structure initialization.
The initialization logic correctly sets up the loading state and clears errors under the new apiResponses.branches path.
✅ Verification successful
State initialization pattern is consistent and correct
The code follows a consistent pattern for managing API response state. The evidence shows proper state management with:
- Loading state toggle
- Error handling
- Value updates
- Consistent path usage across all actions (
apiResponses.branches)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify the state structure initialization
ast-grep --pattern 'interface GitState {
$$$
apiResponses: {
$$$
branches: {
$$$
}
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 127
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the state interface
# First, find files that might contain the GitState interface
fd "types?.ts" --exec rg -l "GitState"
# Then look for the actual interface definition with context
rg "interface GitState" -A 10
Length of output: 70
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's also check the actual usage of apiResponses.branches
rg "apiResponses\.branches" -A 2
Length of output: 1115
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any Redux state selectors that might reveal the structure
rg "createSelector.*branches" -A 3
Length of output: 355
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchMetadataActions.ts (2)
13-14: LGTM! Clean and type-safe implementation.
The success action properly updates both the loading state and metadata value.
5-6: Verify apiResponses structure initialization
The state updates look correct, but we should ensure the apiResponses.metadata structure is properly initialized in the reducer's initial state.
✅ Verification successful
Let's also check if there's a slice file that might contain the state definition:
State structure is properly initialized and consistent
The apiResponses.metadata structure is correctly initialized in singleArtifactInitialState.ts with the proper shape:
metadata: {
value: null,
loading: false,
error: null
}The state updates in the action are consistent with this structure and follow the established pattern used across all API actions in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for initial state definition
ast-grep --pattern 'initialState = {
$$$
apiResponses: {
metadata: {
$$$
}
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 107
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for initialState and state interfaces/types
# First, find the reducer file
fd "reducer" app/client/packages/git/src
# Then search for state interface and initial state
rg -l "initialState|interface.*State" app/client/packages/git/src
Length of output: 199
Script:
#!/bin/bash
fd "slice" app/client/packages/git/src
# Search for apiResponses in any TypeScript files
rg "apiResponses" --type ts app/client/packages/git/src
Length of output: 14825
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the initial state helper and types
cat app/client/packages/git/src/actions/helpers/singleArtifactInitialState.ts
# Also check the types file for the state structure
cat app/client/packages/git/src/types.ts
Length of output: 5658
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/toggleAutocommitActions.ts (3)
1-3: LGTM! Clean and focused imports.
13-19: LGTM! Clean success action implementation.
4-11: Verify state path existence
The action assumes state.apiResponses.toggleAutocommit exists in the Redux store.
✅ Verification successful
State path is properly initialized
The state path state.apiResponses.toggleAutocommit is correctly defined in the initial state at app/client/packages/git/src/actions/helpers/singleArtifactInitialState.ts with the expected structure containing loading and error fields.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the state structure initialization
# Look for initial state definition that includes toggleAutocommit
# Search for initial state or reducer setup
ast-grep --pattern 'const initialState = {
$$$
apiResponses: {
$$$
toggleAutocommit: {
$$$
}
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 137
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for state initialization patterns
rg -U "initialState.*?=.*?{[\s\S]*?}" -g "*.ts" -A 10
# Also search for reducer setup that might initialize the state
ast-grep --pattern 'createReducer({
$$$
})'
# Look for any references to toggleAutocommit in state
rg "toggleAutocommit" -g "*.ts" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 4891
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/triggerAutocommitActions.ts (3)
1-2: LGTM: Clean imports with proper type imports
21-30: LGTM: Proper error handling with type safety
Error action correctly handles the payload and updates relevant state fields.
13-19: Verify if response data handling is needed
The success action only updates the loading state. Verify if there's any response data that should be stored in the state.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can generate the final response as the code shows a complete picture of the autocommit flow:
No response data handling needed - current implementation is correct
The API call in GitSyncAPI.triggerAutocommit is a simple POST request that initiates the autocommit process. The saga shows that on success, it optionally starts a progress polling action if autocommit is happening. The state management only needs to track loading/error states as designed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for API calls or saga files that might show what data should be stored
rg -t ts "triggerAutocommit" --glob "!*.test.*" -A 5
Length of output: 9226
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/updateLocalConfigActions.ts (3)
1-2: LGTM! Clean and minimal imports
The imports are well-organized and only include what's necessary for the actions.
21-30: LGTM! Well-structured error handling
The error action properly handles the error state with appropriate typing and state updates.
4-11: Verify state path existence
The action correctly initializes the loading state and clears errors. However, let's verify that the state path apiResponses.updateLocalConfig exists in the Redux store.
✅ Verification successful
State path exists and is correctly structured
The apiResponses.updateLocalConfig path exists in the Redux store's initial state with the expected loading and error fields. The structure is properly defined in the gitSingleArtifactInitialAPIResponses object.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the state structure definition exists
# Look for type definitions or initial state that defines this path
# Search for type definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
apiResponses: {
$$$
updateLocalConfig: $_
$$$
}
}'
# Search for initial state
rg -A 5 'updateLocalConfig.*[:=].*{.*loading'
Length of output: 295
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for type definitions with correct spacing and optional properties
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
apiResponses: {
updateLocalConfig: $_
}
}'
# Search for initial state with fixed regex
rg "updateLocalConfig.*[:=].*\{" -A 5
# Search for any mentions of updateLocalConfig in state types
rg "updateLocalConfig.*[:=].*\{|type.*updateLocalConfig|interface.*updateLocalConfig" -A 5
# Look for state initialization
ast-grep --pattern 'const initialState = {
apiResponses: {
$$$
updateLocalConfig: $_
$$$
}
}'
Length of output: 1446
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the singleArtifactInitialState file to understand the structure
cat app/client/packages/git/src/actions/helpers/singleArtifactInitialState.ts
# Also check if there's a type definition file for the state
fd -e ts -e d.ts "types|interfaces" --exec rg -l "apiResponses"
Length of output: 2885
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/updateGlobalConfigActions.ts (1)
1-30: Verify integration with other Git configuration actions
The action pattern looks good and follows Redux best practices. Let's verify the consistency with related actions.
✅ Verification successful
Integration with Git configuration actions is consistent
The code follows the same pattern used across all Git-related actions in the codebase. All actions:
- Use
createSingleArtifactActionhelper - Follow consistent state management for loading and error states
- Handle API responses in the same way through
state.apiResponses - Maintain identical structure for init/success/error action triplets
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent patterns across Git configuration actions
# Expected: Similar state management patterns in related files
# Search for similar configuration action patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'export const $_ConfigAction = createSingleArtifactAction(
(state$_) => {
state.apiResponses.$_.loading = $_;
$$$
}
)'
# Check for consistent state structure
rg -A 2 'apiResponses\..*Config\.'
Length of output: 151
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find related configuration actions
# Search for files with Config actions
fd -e ts -e js "Config.*Actions\.ts"
# Search for similar state management patterns with more flexible matching
rg "state\.apiResponses\." -A 2 -B 2
# Look for createSingleArtifactAction usage
rg "createSingleArtifactAction" -A 3 -B 1
# Check the state structure in related files
fd "types\.ts" --exec rg -l "apiResponses"
Length of output: 80145
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchSSHKeyActions.ts (2)
1-3: LGTM! Clean imports with good type usage
The imports are well-organized, using type imports appropriately and leveraging a helper function for action creation.
4-9: Verify consistent usage of apiResponses pattern
The init action follows good practices by properly setting loading state and clearing errors. Let's verify this pattern is consistent across other similar actions.
✅ Verification successful
apiResponses pattern is consistently implemented across all actions
The search results confirm that all action files in the git package follow the same pattern for handling API responses:
- Setting loading to true and clearing error in init actions
- Setting loading to false in success actions
- Setting loading to false and error in failure actions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistent usage of apiResponses pattern in other action files
rg -A 2 "apiResponses\." "app/client/packages/git/src/actions/"
Length of output: 24770
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/updateProtectedBranchesActions.ts (3)
1-3: LGTM! Clean and focused imports.
The imports are well-organized with types properly separated.
21-30: LGTM! Well-structured error handling.
The error action properly handles both the loading state and error message with good type safety.
13-19: Verify if response handling is needed.
The success action only sets loading to false. Should it handle any response data from the API?
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results from previous scripts, I can now provide a final response:
No response data handling needed
The API endpoint is designed to only update protected branches status without returning any data. This is evident from:
- The server-side implementation returns
Mono<Void>indicating no response data - The state type is
AsyncStateWithoutValuewhich indicates it's a stateless operation - The success action correctly only needs to update the loading state
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for API calls or related types that might indicate expected response data
rg -A 5 "updateProtectedBranches.*Response"
ast-grep --pattern 'interface GitState {
$$$
apiResponses: {
$$$
updateProtectedBranches: {
$$$
}
$$$
}
}'
Length of output: 182
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for API calls and types related to updateProtectedBranches
rg -A 5 "updateProtectedBranches"
# Search for the state interface definition
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
apiResponses: {
$$$
}
}'
Length of output: 25393
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the type definition of AsyncStateWithoutValue
rg "type AsyncStateWithoutValue" -A 3
# Search for the API response type
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
updateProtectedBranches: {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 132
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchLocalConfigActions.ts (2)
1-2: LGTM! Clean and focused imports
The imports are well-structured, importing only the necessary types and helper function.
4-11: LGTM! Clean initialization action implementation
The action correctly sets the loading state and clears any previous errors.
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchMergeStatusActions.ts (3)
1-2: LGTM! Clean and focused imports
The imports are well-structured, importing only what's needed and using proper type definitions.
13-23: LGTM! Well-typed success action
The success action properly handles the merge status response with appropriate typing.
4-11: Verify state structure exists
The implementation follows Redux best practices for handling loading states.
✅ Verification successful
The previous pattern didn't yield results, so I'm broadening the search to:
- Find the GitState interface directly
- Look for mergeStatus property definitions
- Search for any state type definitions in the git package
This will help verify the state structure exists and matches the usage in the action.
State structure is correctly implemented
The state structure exists and matches the usage:
- Found in
app/client/packages/git/src/types.ts:mergeStatus: AsyncState<GitMergeStatus> - Initial state defined in
singleArtifactInitialState.tswith correct shape:{ value: null, loading: false, error: null } - Action correctly modifies this structure by setting
loading: trueanderror: null
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify the state structure exists in the slice
ast-grep --pattern 'interface GitState {
$$$
apiResponses: {
$$$
mergeStatus: {
$$$
}
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 130
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for GitState interface definition
rg "interface GitState" -A 10
# Search for mergeStatus type definition
rg "mergeStatus.*:" -A 3
# Search for state type definitions in the git package
fd -e ts -e tsx --exec rg "interface.*State|type.*State" -A 10 {} \; app/client/packages/git/
Length of output: 3736
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchGlobalConfigActions.ts (4)
1-2: LGTM! Clean and focused imports
The imports are well-structured, importing only the necessary types and helper function.
13-23: LGTM! Well-typed success action
The success action is properly typed and handles the state updates correctly.
4-11: Verify state path existence in reducer
The action correctly handles the initialization state, but we should verify the state path.
✅ Verification successful
State path is correctly defined in the interface
The globalConfig state path exists in the GitSingleArtifactAPIResponsesReduxState interface with the correct structure, including the loading and error fields through the AsyncState type. The action is using the state path as intended.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the state path is properly defined in the reducer
ast-grep --pattern 'interface GitState {
apiResponses: {
$$$
globalConfig: {
$$$
}
$$$
}
}'
Length of output: 119
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the state interface and reducer
# First, find files that might contain the state interface
fd "types|state|reducer" --extension ts
# Then search for globalConfig usage in state
rg "globalConfig.*loading|loading.*globalConfig" --type ts
Length of output: 16286
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the types.ts file in the git package for the state interface
cat app/client/packages/git/src/types.ts
Length of output: 2875
1-34: Verify integration with related Redux components
The implementation follows Redux patterns well and aligns with the PR objectives. Let's verify the integration points.
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchProtectedBranchesActions.ts (3)
1-2: LGTM! Clean and focused imports
The imports are well-structured, importing only what's needed with proper type definitions.
28-37: LGTM! Well-structured error handling
The error handling follows Redux best practices with proper state updates and clean error extraction.
1-37: Verify consistent usage of apiResponses pattern
The implementation follows the new pattern of using state.apiResponses namespace. Let's verify this pattern is consistently applied across other Redux slices.
✅ Verification successful
The apiResponses pattern is consistently implemented across the Git package
The search results confirm that all Redux actions in the Git package follow the same pattern using state.apiResponses namespace, with consistent handling of loading, error, and value states. The implementation in fetchProtectedBranchesActions.ts aligns perfectly with this established pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistent usage of apiResponses pattern in other Redux files
rg -g "*.ts" "state\.apiResponses\." app/client/packages/git/src/
Length of output: 14522
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchAutocommitProgressActions.ts (3)
1-3: LGTM! Clean imports with clear type definitions.
The imports are well-organized and the helper function usage promotes consistency across actions.
13-26: LGTM! Well-structured success action.
The action is properly typed and handles state updates cleanly.
1-37: Verify integration with autocommit feature
The implementation looks solid, but let's verify it handles all necessary autocommit states as per the requirements in issue #36810.
✅ Verification successful
Implementation correctly handles autocommit states
The implementation properly manages all required autocommit states through:
- Loading, success, and error states in Redux store
- Integration with GitAutocommitProgressResponse interface
- Proper saga implementation for progress polling
- Complete type safety with GitArtifactPayloadAction
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other autocommit-related files and state handling
rg -t ts "autocommit" --glob "!*.test.ts"
# Look for related Redux slice definition
ast-grep --pattern 'createSlice({
$$$
autocommitProgress: $$$
$$$
})'
Length of output: 2473
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the GitAutocommitProgress type definition
ast-grep --pattern 'type GitAutocommitProgress = {
$$$
}'
# Check for any autocommit-related Redux actions and their usage
rg -t ts "GitAutocommitProgress" -A 3 -B 3
# Look for the Redux state interface
ast-grep --pattern 'interface GitState {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 5352
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/helpers/singleArtifactInitialState.ts (3)
1-11: LGTM! Well-organized imports with proper type definitions.
The separation of enums and types, along with their consistent usage throughout the file, follows best practices.
144-147: LGTM! Safe usage of initial state with Redux Toolkit.
The combined export is well-structured. As per previous learnings, using the same initial state object is safe with Redux Toolkit since it uses Immer internally.
35-142: Consider extracting common API response types and verify against design doc.
- The API response states follow consistent patterns. Consider extracting these into reusable types:
type BaseAPIState<T = null> = {
loading: boolean;
error: null | Error;
value?: T | null;
};
// Usage example:
const gitSingleArtifactInitialAPIResponses = {
metadata: BaseAPIState<MetadataType>,
connect: BaseAPIState,
// ... etc
};- Please verify that these Redux store keys align with the design document mentioned in the PR objectives.
| @@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ export const commitErrorAction = createSingleArtifactAction( | |||
| (state, action: GitArtifactPayloadAction<{ error: string }>) => { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we put { error: string } in an interface and use it across the board? This seems to be a common pattern and will help us expand in future as well
app/client/packages/git/src/enums.ts
Outdated
| @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ | |||
| export enum GitArtifactType { | |||
| application = "application", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we use Pascal case for the keys?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
app/client/packages/git/src/enums.ts (1)
7-17: Consider consolidating similar enums
GitConnectStepandGitImportStephave identical values. Consider consolidating them into a single enum if they serve similar purposes, or document the distinct use cases if they need to remain separate.app/client/packages/git/src/actions/triggerAutocommitActions.ts (2)
4-11: Add type annotation for state parameterWhile the code is functionally correct, adding a type annotation for the state parameter would improve type safety.
- (state) => { + (state: GitState) => {
1-30: Add unit tests for Redux actionsThese new Redux actions should be covered by unit tests to ensure they properly handle state transitions.
Would you like me to help generate unit tests for these actions?
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchMetadataActions.ts (1)
25-29: Consider adding type validation for error messages.While the error handling is correct, consider adding type validation for the error message to ensure consistent error handling across the application.
export const fetchMetadataErrorAction = createSingleArtifactAction( (state, action: GitArtifactErrorPayloadAction) => { const { error } = action.payload; + // Ensure error is of type string + const errorMessage = typeof error === 'string' ? error : 'Unknown error occurred'; state.apiResponses.metadata.loading = false; - state.apiResponses.metadata.error = error; + state.apiResponses.metadata.error = errorMessage; return state; }, );app/client/packages/git/src/types.ts (2)
17-28: Add TODO comments for contract finalizationSimilar to the existing GitMetadata comment, add TODO comments for these new types to track when their contracts will be finalized.
export type GitMergeStatus = Record<string, unknown>; +// TODO: Update when merge status contract is finalized export type GitGlobalConfig = Record<string, unknown>; +// TODO: Update when config contracts are finalized
97-106: Consider adding JSDoc commentsThe types are well-structured, but documentation would help explain the purpose of GitArtifactErrorPayloadAction.
+/** + * Represents an error action payload for Git operations + * @example + * dispatch(gitError({ artifactType: 'repository', baseArtifactId: '123', error: 'Failed to connect' })) + */ export type GitArtifactErrorPayloadAction = GitArtifactPayloadAction<{ error: string; }>;app/client/packages/git/src/actions/helpers/singleArtifactInitialState.ts (1)
35-142: Consider refactoring repetitive initializations to improve maintainabilityThe
gitSingleArtifactInitialAPIResponsesobject contains repetitive code for initializing each API response's state. To enhance maintainability and reduce duplication, consider creating helper functions to generate these initial states.Apply this diff to refactor the code:
+const createInitialResponseState = <T>(value: T | null = null) => ({ + value, + loading: false, + error: null, +}); +const createInitialLoadingState = () => ({ + loading: false, + error: null, +}); const gitSingleArtifactInitialAPIResponses: GitSingleArtifactAPIResponsesReduxState = { - metadata: { - value: null, - loading: false, - error: null, - }, + metadata: createInitialResponseState(), connect: { - loading: false, - error: null, - }, + ...createInitialLoadingState(), }, status: { - value: null, - loading: false, - error: null, - }, + status: createInitialResponseState(), commit: { - loading: false, - error: null, - }, + ...createInitialLoadingState(), }, // Apply the same pattern for the remaining properties };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (27)
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/checkoutBranchActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/commitActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/connectActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/createBranchActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/deleteBranchActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/discardActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/disconnectActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchAutocommitProgressActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchBranchesActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchGlobalConfigActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchLocalConfigActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchMergeStatusActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchMetadataActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchProtectedBranchesActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchSSHKeyActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchStatusActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/generateSSHKey.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/helpers/singleArtifactInitialState.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/mergeActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/pullActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/toggleAutocommitActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/triggerAutocommitActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/updateGlobalConfigActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/updateLocalConfigActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/actions/updateProtectedBranchesActions.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/enums.ts(1 hunks)app/client/packages/git/src/types.ts(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (22)
- app/client/packages/git/src/actions/checkoutBranchActions.ts
- app/client/packages/git/src/actions/commitActions.ts
- app/client/packages/git/src/actions/connectActions.ts
- app/client/packages/git/src/actions/createBranchActions.ts
- app/client/packages/git/src/actions/deleteBranchActions.ts
- app/client/packages/git/src/actions/discardActions.ts
- app/client/packages/git/src/actions/disconnectActions.ts
- app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchAutocommitProgressActions.ts
- app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchBranchesActions.ts
- app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchGlobalConfigActions.ts
- app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchLocalConfigActions.ts
- app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchMergeStatusActions.ts
- app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchProtectedBranchesActions.ts
- app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchSSHKeyActions.ts
- app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchStatusActions.ts
- app/client/packages/git/src/actions/generateSSHKey.ts
- app/client/packages/git/src/actions/mergeActions.ts
- app/client/packages/git/src/actions/pullActions.ts
- app/client/packages/git/src/actions/toggleAutocommitActions.ts
- app/client/packages/git/src/actions/updateGlobalConfigActions.ts
- app/client/packages/git/src/actions/updateLocalConfigActions.ts
- app/client/packages/git/src/actions/updateProtectedBranchesActions.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/helpers/singleArtifactInitialState.ts (1)
Learnt from: brayn003
PR: appsmithorg/appsmith#36989
File: app/client/packages/git/src/actions/helpers/createSingleArtifactAction.ts:12-41
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T08:11:25.416Z
Learning: In Redux Toolkit (TypeScript), since it uses Immer internally, assigning the same initial state object across artifacts does not lead to shared mutable state issues.
🔇 Additional comments (13)
app/client/packages/git/src/enums.ts (2)
1-27: LGTM for remaining enums
The other enums (GitArtifactType, GitOpsTab, GitSettingsTab) are well-structured with consistent PascalCase naming and clear purposes.
15-15:
Use PascalCase for enum values consistently
The value remote should be in PascalCase to maintain consistency with other enum values.
- remote = "remote",
+ Remote = "Remote",Likely invalid or redundant comment.
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/triggerAutocommitActions.ts (2)
1-2: LGTM: Clean imports with type separation
The imports are well-organized with proper type separation.
21-30: Verify consistent error handling pattern
The error handling looks good. Let's verify this pattern is consistent across other Git actions.
✅ Verification successful
Error handling pattern is consistent across Git actions
The error handling implementation follows a consistent pattern across all Git-related actions in the codebase. Each error action:
- Uses the same
GitArtifactErrorPayloadActiontype - Destructures error from payload
- Sets loading to false
- Updates the corresponding error state
- Returns the updated state
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for error action patterns in Git-related files
ast-grep --pattern 'export const $_ErrorAction = createSingleArtifactAction(
(state, action: GitArtifactErrorPayloadAction) => {
$$$
state.apiResponses.$_.error = $_
$$$
}
)'
Length of output: 192
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for error handling patterns in Git-related files
rg -U "state\.apiResponses.*\.error.*=.*error" --type ts
# Also search for similar error action patterns
rg -U "export const \w+ErrorAction = createSingleArtifactAction" -A 10 --type ts
Length of output: 24322
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/fetchMetadataActions.ts (4)
1-5: LGTM! Clean type imports with proper separation of concerns.
The separation of error and success payload types improves type safety.
9-10: LGTM! Proper initialization of loading state and error clearing.
The state path follows the new structure using apiResponses.metadata.
17-18: LGTM! Proper success state handling.
Correctly updates loading state and metadata value with proper typing.
Line range hint 1-33: Verify consistent usage of apiResponses pattern across Redux slices.
The implementation follows the new pattern of using apiResponses namespace. Let's verify this pattern is consistently applied across other Redux slices.
✅ Verification successful
The apiResponses pattern is consistently implemented across all Redux slices
The search results confirm that all Redux action files in the Git package consistently follow the same pattern:
- Using
apiResponsesnamespace - Managing loading, error, and value states uniformly
- Following the same state update structure across init/success/error actions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other Redux slices to verify consistent usage of apiResponses
rg -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' 'state\.apiResponses' ./app/client/packages/git/src
Length of output: 14790
app/client/packages/git/src/types.ts (4)
35-38: LGTM! Good extraction of common interface
Clean abstraction that removes duplication for async states that don't need values.
66-86: LGTM! Well-structured UI state management
Good use of enum keys for type-safe step/tab management across modals.
87-89: LGTM! Clean state organization
Good separation of UI and API concerns in the Redux state.
39-64: Verify naming consistency across codebase
The interface structure looks good with clear separation of concerns. Let's verify the naming consistency with actions and reducers.
✅ Verification successful
Naming convention is consistent across the codebase
The action files in app/client/packages/git/src/actions/ perfectly align with the state interface properties, following a consistent pattern:
connectActions.ts→connectstatecommitActions.ts→commitstatepullActions.ts→pullstatediscardActions.ts→discardstate
And so on for all operations defined in the interface.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistent naming in actions and reducers
rg -t typescript "createAction|createReducer" | grep -iE "connect|commit|pull|discard|merge|checkout|create|delete|disconnect"
Length of output: 163
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for action creators and reducers in the git package
rg "createAction|createReducer" app/client/packages/git/src/
Length of output: 62
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the interface usage and related types
rg "GitSingleArtifactAPIResponsesReduxState" app/client/packages/git/src/
Length of output: 540
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all TypeScript files in the git package to analyze naming patterns
fd -e ts -e tsx . app/client/packages/git/src/
Length of output: 1923
app/client/packages/git/src/actions/helpers/singleArtifactInitialState.ts (1)
13-33: Initial UI state is well-defined
The gitSingleArtifactInitialUIState object is correctly initialized with appropriate default values.
…mithorg#37830) ## Description - Updates the keys for redux store according to https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVL-Nij1k=/?share_link_id=2678396780 - Adds pending actions Fixes appsmithorg#36808 Fixes appsmithorg#36809 Fixes appsmithorg#36810 ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.Git" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12080417362> > Commit: 3d9de62 > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=12080417362&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.Git` > Spec: > <hr>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 08:00:47 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Release Notes - **New Features** - Introduced new actions for managing branch operations (checkout, create, delete) and configurations (global, local). - Added actions for fetching and updating various Git-related data, including autocommit progress, merge status, and SSH keys. - New enumerations for Git artifact types and connection steps to enhance clarity and organization. - **Bug Fixes** - Improved error handling and loading state management across various actions. - **Documentation** - Enhanced type definitions and state structure for clearer understanding and usage. - **Refactor** - Updated state management structure to utilize a nested approach under `apiResponses`, improving consistency across actions. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Description
Fixes #36808
Fixes #36809
Fixes #36810
Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Git"
🔍 Cypress test results
Tip
🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12080417362
Commit: 3d9de62
Cypress dashboard.
Tags:
@tag.GitSpec:
Fri, 29 Nov 2024 08:00:47 UTC
Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Refactor
apiResponses, improving consistency across actions.