Add MAX6675 sensor (v2) #8616
Merged
Add MAX6675 sensor (v2) #8616
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is basically a cut down version of MAX31855 without reference temperature reading and lower resolution (only positive, 12bit only). This implements 16bit protocol (31855 uses 32bit). SetOption94 enables the new behavior. Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> --- Changes: v2: * treat occasional 0xfff as an error * do not add new sensor pins, use SetOption94 instead
|
Now wan't that fun ;-) |
arendst
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 4, 2020
Add command ``SetOption94 0/1`` to select MAX31855 or MAX6675 thermocouple support (#8616)
Indeed :-) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is basically a cut down version of MAX31855 without reference
temperature reading and lower resolution (only positive, 12bit only).
This is an update based on #8610 (comment)
Thanks,