Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ArgoCD v1.5.0 occured warning kustomize build #3348

Closed
2 of 3 tasks
yutachaos opened this issue Apr 3, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed
2 of 3 tasks

ArgoCD v1.5.0 occured warning kustomize build #3348

yutachaos opened this issue Apr 3, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@yutachaos
Copy link
Contributor

yutachaos commented Apr 3, 2020

Checklist:

  • I've searched in the docs and FAQ for my answer: http://bit.ly/argocd-faq.
  • I've included steps to reproduce the bug.
  • I've pasted the output of argocd version.

Describe the bug

  • I used argocd by using remote build of kustomize, but a warning has come out from v1.5.0.
    I didn't see it in v1.4.2.
2020/04/03 19:47:55 nil value at `env.valueFrom.configMapKeyRef.name` ignored in mutation attempt
2020/04/03 19:47:55 nil value at `env.valueFrom.secretKeyRef.name` ignored in mutation attempt

To Reproduce

  • Do kustomize build with remote build.

Expected behavior

Version

  • argocd v1.5.0

  • kustomize 3.5.4

  • Run kubeval to make the results more understood.

kustomize build github.com/argoproj/argo-cd//manifests/ha/cluster-install?ref=v1.5.0 | kubeval --ignore-missing-schemas
WARN - Set to ignore missing schemas
2020/04/03 19:47:55 nil value at `env.valueFrom.configMapKeyRef.name` ignored in mutation attempt
2020/04/03 19:47:55 nil value at `env.valueFrom.secretKeyRef.name` ignored in mutation attempt
WARN - stdin containing a CustomResourceDefinition was not validated against a schema
WARN - stdin containing a CustomResourceDefinition was not validated against a schema
PASS - stdin contains a valid ServiceAccount
PASS - stdin contains a valid ServiceAccount
PASS - stdin contains a valid ServiceAccount
PASS - stdin contains a valid ServiceAccount
PASS - stdin contains a valid ServiceAccount
PASS - stdin contains a valid Role
PASS - stdin contains a valid Role
PASS - stdin contains a valid Role
PASS - stdin contains a valid Role
PASS - stdin contains a valid ClusterRole
PASS - stdin contains a valid ClusterRole
PASS - stdin contains a valid RoleBinding
PASS - stdin contains a valid RoleBinding
PASS - stdin contains a valid RoleBinding
PASS - stdin contains a valid RoleBinding
PASS - stdin contains a valid ClusterRoleBinding
PASS - stdin contains a valid ClusterRoleBinding
PASS - stdin contains a valid ConfigMap
PASS - stdin contains a valid ConfigMap
PASS - stdin contains a valid ConfigMap
PASS - stdin contains a valid ConfigMap
PASS - stdin contains a valid ConfigMap
PASS - stdin contains a valid Secret
PASS - stdin contains a valid Service
PASS - stdin contains a valid Service
PASS - stdin contains a valid Service
PASS - stdin contains a valid Service
PASS - stdin contains a valid Service
PASS - stdin contains a valid Service
PASS - stdin contains a valid Service
PASS - stdin contains a valid Service
PASS - stdin contains a valid Service
PASS - stdin contains a valid Service
PASS - stdin contains a valid Deployment
PASS - stdin contains a valid Deployment
PASS - stdin contains a valid Deployment
PASS - stdin contains a valid Deployment
PASS - stdin contains a valid Deployment
PASS - stdin contains a valid StatefulSet
@yutachaos
Copy link
Contributor Author

#3370
This PR is merged.
Closed is this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant