-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 152
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add show only framed works filter #15108
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
#1588 Bundle Size — 8.97MiB (-0.32%).4b6aed3(current) vs 41ddd7f main#1587(baseline) Warning Bundle contains 14 duplicate packages – View duplicate packages Bundle metrics
|
Current #1588 |
Baseline #1587 |
|
---|---|---|
Initial JS | 3.65MiB (-0.05% ) |
3.65MiB |
Initial CSS | 0B |
0B |
Cache Invalidation | 53.74% |
43.59% |
Chunks | 104 |
104 |
Assets | 107 |
107 |
Modules | 5831 (-0.39% ) |
5854 |
Duplicate Modules | 515 (-3.01% ) |
531 |
Duplicate Code | 3.97% (-2.7% ) |
4.08% |
Packages | 266 |
266 |
Duplicate Packages | 13 |
13 |
Bundle size by type 2 changes
1 regression
1 improvement
Current #1588 |
Baseline #1587 |
|
---|---|---|
JS | 8.83MiB (-0.33% ) |
8.86MiB |
Other | 145.45KiB (+0.15% ) |
145.23KiB |
Bundle analysis report Branch feat/support-framed-filtering Project dashboard
Generated by RelativeCI Documentation Report issue
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks legit, nice job!
// but NOT as an alert criterion, so we remove it. | ||
// (Alerts, by definition, stipulate forSale=true | ||
// when they are created in Gravity.) | ||
delete criteria.forSale | ||
delete criteria.framed |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thought (non-blocking): I think this makes sense for now. Maybe a product decision about whether this would be a desirable alert criteria, but we can always follow up on that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🌟
const enableShowOnlyFramedArtworksFilter = useFeatureFlag( | ||
"onyx_only_framed_artworks_filter", | ||
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we really need the feature flag? In case something goes wrong, we cand simply roll back the feature.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FWIW I'm in favor of the feature flag. Gives us the ability to do more fine-grained QA (in staging, or per user) before launching. I love the velocity of Hackathon but I appreciate rolling things out intentionally like this 😄
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
True, the feature flag gives more flexibility for the release (and frees us from having to follow the bug-free programming principle 😄).
The type of this PR is: feat
This PR adds show only framed works filter to artwork filters
This PR is a follow-up to artsy/eigen#11435, artsy/metaphysics#6369 and https://github.com/artsy/gravity/pull/18481
Screen.Recording.2025-01-23.at.15.18.50.mov