-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 106
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for socket asynchronous api for recv
& recvfrom
#1390
base: feature/distributed-erlang
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add support for socket asynchronous api for recv
& recvfrom
#1390
Conversation
5d52096
to
9c3c068
Compare
3957e08
to
6c02e94
Compare
adeb52b
to
b9aa1d6
Compare
Also improve socket stability. Signed-off-by: Paul Guyot <pguyot@kallisys.net>
b9aa1d6
to
f186dc1
Compare
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ | |||
# SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 OR LGPL-2.1-or-later | |||
# | |||
|
|||
include(ExternalProject) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just for my understanding: what is the purpose of this specific change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe it was required when I compiled this on some esoteric platform to try to reproduce CI issues.
Is this PR a good opportunity for supporting both active and passive ssl sockets (and also when using socket as backend for gen_tcp and gen_udp)? |
These changes are made under both the "Apache 2.0" and the "GNU Lesser General
Public License 2.1 or later" license terms (dual license).
SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 OR LGPL-2.1-or-later