-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Monitor/sync bug while using at_chops with pkam from secure element #1050
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
89cf9de
fix: at_chops secure element - monitor bug
murali-shris 0cebe0b
fix: at_chops secure element bug in sync
murali-shris f5b6525
fix: set hashing and signing algo type in at_lookup from preferences
murali-shris 22788ea
fix: added logging for signing and hashing algo in remote secondary
murali-shris 679c797
fix: added logging statement to debug
murali-shris e3a8ab1
fix: changed logging text in sync service
murali-shris de595e4
fix: removed setting signing and hashing algo in at_client_impl
murali-shris fa32842
fix: removed setting signing and hashing algo in sync service
murali-shris f73eb15
fix: removed logging statements
murali-shris a0c1b0d
chore:removed unwanted diff
murali-shris e4a6d98
Merge branch 'trunk' into monitor_bug_secure_element
murali-shris 36d3194
fix: add unit test for monitor and atchops
murali-shris 4afc9e7
Merge branch 'monitor_bug_secure_element' of https://github.com/atsig…
murali-shris 9c7a7b4
fix: changelog and pubspec for sync/monitor bug fix
murali-shris File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should also have an additional auth test for RemoteSecondary for when useAtChops is true
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
authenticate and authenticateCram methods in RemoteSecondary are no longer used.
executeVerb and executeCommand methods in RemoteSecondary, delegates the call to atLookup which does the auth.
Can I explore writing tests for AtLookup auth?