Bump convert-source-map dependency, clean up duplicate require call #714
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The generateMapFileComment() method used in #662 isn't available in v1.1.2.
No need to require the generateMapFileComment() method separately. Also remove unnecessary linebreak at the end of the file.
|
By analyzing the blame information on this pull request, we identified @spudly, @ivogabe and @jokeyrhyme to be potential reviewers |
| @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ | |||
| 'use strict'; | |||
| var path = require('path'); | |||
| var fs = require('fs'); | |||
| var generateMapFileComment = require('convert-source-map').generateMapFileComment; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it would be cleaner to remove var convertSourceMap instead of a shortcut.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
convertSourceMap is used elsewhere in this file.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Some follow-up to #662.