Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: integ test trying to downgrade bootstrap stack #17298

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 3, 2021

Conversation

rix0rrr
Copy link
Contributor

@rix0rrr rix0rrr commented Nov 3, 2021

This is a follow-up to #17277: we switched to always bootstrapping
the environment using the default settings, to automatically upgrade
whenever an upgrade was available.

However, if we run the integ test using a v1 CLI, the default bootstrap
stack will be the legacy bootstrap, and we would actually be trying
to downgrade it. Instead, always use the modern bootstrap stack.

Since legacy apps can be deployed to the modern bootstrap stack, this
is not an issue, and if a test actually needs the legacy stack to test
something, it will explicitly try to create a fresh legacy bootstrap
stack.


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

This is a follow-up to #17277: we switched to *always* bootstrapping
the environment using the default settings, to automatically upgrade
whenever an upgrade was available.

However, if we run the integ test using a v1 CLI, the default bootstrap
stack will be the legacy bootstrap, and we would actually be trying
to *downgrade* it. Instead, always use the modern bootstrap stack.

Since legacy apps can be deployed to the modern bootstrap stack, this
is not an issue, and if a test actually needs the legacy stack to test
something, it will explicitly try to create a fresh legacy bootstrap
stack.
@rix0rrr rix0rrr requested a review from a team November 3, 2021 09:28
@rix0rrr rix0rrr self-assigned this Nov 3, 2021
@gitpod-io
Copy link

gitpod-io bot commented Nov 3, 2021

@mergify mergify bot added the contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS. label Nov 3, 2021
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Nov 3, 2021

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from master and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildProject89A8053A-LhjRyN9kxr8o
  • Commit ID: 9e9f65a
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@mergify mergify bot merged commit b98c42e into master Nov 3, 2021
@mergify mergify bot deleted the huijbers/bootstrapm-modern branch November 3, 2021 12:04
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Nov 3, 2021

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from master and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

TikiTDO pushed a commit to TikiTDO/aws-cdk that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2022
This is a follow-up to aws#17277: we switched to *always* bootstrapping
the environment using the default settings, to automatically upgrade
whenever an upgrade was available.

However, if we run the integ test using a v1 CLI, the default bootstrap
stack will be the legacy bootstrap, and we would actually be trying
to *downgrade* it. Instead, always use the modern bootstrap stack.

Since legacy apps can be deployed to the modern bootstrap stack, this
is not an issue, and if a test actually needs the legacy stack to test
something, it will explicitly try to create a fresh legacy bootstrap
stack.


----

*By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants