-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(dynamodb): add tagging support to TableV2 #27649
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.
A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request
. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request
to a comment.
be9deed
to
97adde9
Compare
✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.
97adde9
to
cddcacc
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The pull request linter has failed. See the aws-cdk-automation comment below for failure reasons. If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification.
A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request
. Additionally, if clarification is needed add Clarification Request
to a comment.
f3e181d
to
ffb4679
Compare
✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.
ffb4679
to
317e792
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mikevec23 I think this looks great! My only concern is with using CfnTag
vs. Tags.of(...).add(...)
. I recognize that the underlying L1 doesn't implement the ITaggable
interface which would prevent the use of Tags
, but I'd like to get another opinion on whether this is the right approach or if we should find a way to do this using Tags
. I'll get an update for you soon.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your contribution @mikevec23 - this looks good!
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork). |
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
This change adds the ability to tag GlobalTable replicas created using the TableV2 construct. The top level "tags" will apply tags to the primary table while tags for each replica can be specified in the respective replica definition. Closes #27146. ---- *By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license*
This change adds the ability to tag GlobalTable replicas created using the TableV2 construct. The top level "tags" will apply tags to the primary table while tags for each replica can be specified in the respective replica definition.
Closes #27146.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license