-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 245
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(pacmak): illegal static overrides in java & c# #2373
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
db6376d
fix(pacmak): illegal static overrides in java & c#
RomainMuller 1c72511
Implemented feedback from @NetaNir.
RomainMuller d74f5f6
update docs, too
RomainMuller 641db86
fixup test expectations
RomainMuller 4aaac98
Merge branch 'main' into rmuller/static-homonyms
mergify[bot] File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
92 changes: 92 additions & 0 deletions
92
packages/jsii-pacmak/test/generated-code/__snapshots__/target-dotnet.test.ts.snap
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could this logic be moved to the
if (method.overrides)
clause above? Reasoning being that we treat static overrides as not overrides, and this can reduce the nesting in the code.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have been internally debating this a little bit... Initially I wanted to simply change the compiler so that statics are never considered to be overrides; but this caused problems, because in JavaScript (and hence, TypeScript), they actually are overrides... This manifests when you try the following:
This made me decide that it was a more coherent story from the author's standpoint if we reproduced the ES6 semantics in the jsii assembly (where statics are inherited with the rest of the prototype). Carrying them as overrides has advantages - in languages where static are inherited (although JS is the only one that comes to mind now), this allows overrides to use
super
.We could distinguish static overrides from non-static overrides, however this distinction is very much a code generation concern, and not so much a type model concern (after all, all we care about is whether this is an override or not, period).