Refactor/dataverse contract #419
Conversation
|
Note Reviews PausedUse the following commands to manage reviews:
WalkthroughThe recent updates to the OKP4 Dataverse smart contract documentation and code comments reflect a shift towards a more claims-based approach, with a focus on Decentralized Identifiers (DID) and the structure of the Dataverse, Zones, and Resources. Metadata attachment functions have been removed in favor of claim submission and revocation, streamlining the contract's functionality around resource identification and verification. Changes
TipsChat with CodeRabbit Bot (
|
size-limit report 📦
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #419 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 96.93% 96.93%
=======================================
Files 48 48
Lines 9858 9858
=======================================
Hits 9556 9556
Misses 302 302 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
ccamel
force-pushed
the
refactor/dataverse-contract
branch
from
7b3786a
to
0b18fc4
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (3)
- contracts/okp4-dataverse/README.md (1 hunks)
- contracts/okp4-dataverse/src/msg.rs (5 hunks)
- docs/okp4-dataverse.md (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 12
contracts/okp4-dataverse/README.md (1)
- 2-44: The documentation has been significantly expanded to provide a detailed understanding of the Dataverse concept, including its structure, components, and their interactions. The explanations of Zones, Resources, DIDs, and Claims are clear and informative, which should help users and developers understand the smart contract's purpose and functionality within the OKP4 protocol. The addition of Dependencies section is also beneficial as it outlines the contract's interactions with other parts of the ecosystem.
One thing to consider is ensuring that all hyperlinks, such as those for Verifiable Presentations and Verifiable Credentials, are up-to-date and lead to the correct resources. This is important for maintaining the integrity and usefulness of the documentation.
docs/okp4-dataverse.md (4)
2-44: The introduction and explanation of the
dataversesmart contract's components are well-detailed and provide a clear understanding of the Dataverse, Zones, Resources, DIDs, and Claims. The explanations are thorough and seem to align with the intended functionality of the contract. The use of clear and concise language enhances the readability of the documentation.49-53: The
InstantiateMsgsection is clear and concise. It specifies the required parameternamewith a clear description. However, ensure that the asterisk formatting for "Required" is consistent and correctly rendered in the markdown or the final documentation format.59-123: The
ExecuteMsgsection provides detailed descriptions and parameters for various contract actions such asRegisterService,RegisterDigitalResource,FoundZone,SubmitClaims, andRevokeClaims. The explanations are comprehensive, and the use of preconditions and detailed parameter descriptions will likely help developers understand how to interact with the contract. Ensure that the removal of theAttachMetadata,DetachMetadata,ReviseMetadatafunctions and their replacement withSubmitClaimsandRevokeClaimsis reflected across all documentation and client code that interacts with this contract.214-217: The footer note indicates that the documentation is auto-generated by a tool named Fadroma from a JSON schema. This is a good practice as it ensures consistency between the contract's schema and its documentation. However, verify that the version of the tool and the schema hash (
dcbd7d6ba7b75fcf) are up to date with the latest changes in the contract.contracts/okp4-dataverse/src/msg.rs (7)
4-9: The comment for
InstantiateMsgis clear and concise, explaining the purpose of the structure. The fieldnameis well-documented, indicating its role as a unique identifier for the dataverse instance.14-35: > Note: This review was outside of the patch, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [14-41]
The comments for
RegisterServicewithin theExecuteMsgenum are detailed and provide a good understanding of the function's purpose and its parameters. The use ofUriandDidtypes is consistent with the rest of the codebase, and the comments explain the preconditions and roles of each parameter effectively.
43-70: The comments for
RegisterDigitalResourceare comprehensive, explaining the concept of a Digital Resource and the importance of its unique identification through a URI. The preconditions for theidentityandprovided_byfields are clearly stated, ensuring that the service must be registered before the dataset can be registered.74-85: The
FoundZonefunction is well-documented, with clear explanations of the concept of aZoneand the role of theidentityandregistrarfields. The optional nature of theregistrarfield is noted, which is a good practice for flexibility.88-110: The
SubmitClaimsfunction is thoroughly commented, explaining the concept of claims, their submission as Verifiable Presentations, and the preconditions that must be met. Themetadataandformatfields are well-documented, including the default format if one is not provided.112-120: The
RevokeClaimsfunction comments clearly state its purpose and the precondition that the identifier of the claims must exist in the dataverse. Theidentifierfield is well-documented, indicating its role in specifying the claims to be revoked.165-170: The type aliases
UriandDidare succinctly documented with references to their respective specifications. This is a good practice as it provides developers with a quick way to find more information about these concepts.
Co-authored-by: Arnaud Mimart <33665250+amimart@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@coderabbitai pause |
This PR addresses #328 by introducing a paradigm shift from #321 in the management of resources within the Dataverse, transitioning from a Metadata-centric approach to a Claims-based approach. According to this new framework, all resources with a decentralized identity (e.g. zones, services, digital resources, entites...) can be described through properties asserted about them by an entity. This mechanism offers greater flexibility and standardization, enhancing trust within the Dataverse.
Accordingly, the underlying ontology that supports these principles will be updated to reflect these changes (see axone-protocol/ontology#205).
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Refactor
Iritype with theUritype for consistency and clarity in the contract's messaging system.