Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run test on the incoming eslint v8 #69

Closed

Conversation

AdrieanKhisbe
Copy link
Collaborator

Configure test and CI so that we ensure we are v8 eslint compatible, cf #68.

We could maybe wait for final release to update then merge the Pull request

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 1, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #69 (c2068c7) into master (a677b11) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head c2068c7 differs from pull request most recent head dc5934c. Consider uploading reports for the commit dc5934c to get more accurate results
Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master       #69   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines           51        51           
=========================================
  Hits            51        51           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a677b11...dc5934c. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@AdrieanKhisbe AdrieanKhisbe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Superseeded by #70

@AdrieanKhisbe AdrieanKhisbe deleted the setup-ci-for-eslint-v8 branch September 17, 2021 14:47
@AdrieanKhisbe AdrieanKhisbe mentioned this pull request Sep 17, 2021
6 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants