[pull] master from torvalds:master #346
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![pull[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/12910?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
When the instances were able to use their own options, the userstacktrace option was left hardcoded for the top level. This made the instance userstacktrace option bascially into a nop, and will confuse users that set it, but nothing happens (I was confused when it happened to me!) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 1627014 ("tracing: Add trace options for core options to instances") Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
…nel/git/rostedt/linux-trace Pull tracing fix from Steven Rostedt: "Fix userstacktrace option for instances While writing an application that requires user stack trace option to work in instances, I found that the instance option has a bug that makes it a nop. The check for performing the user stack trace in an instance, checks the top level options (not the instance options) to determine if a user stack trace should be performed or not. This is not only incorrect, but also confusing for users. It confused me for a bit!" * tag 'trace-v5.10-rc7' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-trace: tracing: Fix userstacktrace option for instances
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 18, 2020
Internally, UBD treats each physical IO segment as a separate command to be submitted in the execution pipe. If the pipe returns a transient error after a few segments have already been written, UBD will tell the block layer to requeue the request, but there is no way to reclaim the segments already submitted. When a new attempt to dispatch the request is done, those segments already submitted will get duplicated, causing the WARN_ON below in the best case, and potentially data corruption. In my system, running a UML instance with 2GB of RAM and a 50M UBD disk, I can reproduce the WARN_ON by simply running mkfs.fvat against the disk on a freshly booted system. There are a few ways to around this, like reducing the pressure on the pipe by reducing the queue depth, which almost eliminates the occurrence of the problem, increasing the pipe buffer size on the host system, or by limiting the request to one physical segment, which causes the block layer to submit way more requests to resolve a single operation. Instead, this patch modifies the format of a UBD command, such that all segments are sent through a single element in the communication pipe, turning the command submission atomic from the point of view of the block layer. The new format has a variable size, depending on the number of elements, and looks like this: +------------+-----------+-----------+------------ | cmd_header | segment 0 | segment 1 | segment ... +------------+-----------+-----------+------------ With this format, we push a pointer to cmd_header in the submission pipe. This has the advantage of reducing the memory footprint of executing a single request, since it allow us to merge some fields in the header. It is possible to reduce even further each segment memory footprint, by merging bitmap_words and cow_offset, for instance, but this is not the focus of this patch and is left as future work. One issue with the patch is that for a big number of segments, we now perform one big memory allocation instead of multiple small ones, but I wasn't able to trigger any real issues or -ENOMEM because of this change, that wouldn't be reproduced otherwise. This was tested using fio with the verify-crc32 option, and by running an ext4 filesystem over this UBD device. The original WARN_ON was: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at lib/refcount.c:28 refcount_warn_saturate+0x13f/0x141 refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free. Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.5.0-rc6-00002-g2a5bb2cf75c8 #346 Stack: 6084eed0 6063dc77 00000009 6084ef60 00000000 604b8d9f 6084eee0 6063dcbc 6084ef40 6006ab8d e013d780 1c00000000 Call Trace: [<600a0c1c>] ? printk+0x0/0x94 [<6004a888>] show_stack+0x13b/0x155 [<6063dc77>] ? dump_stack_print_info+0xdf/0xe8 [<604b8d9f>] ? refcount_warn_saturate+0x13f/0x141 [<6063dcbc>] dump_stack+0x2a/0x2c [<6006ab8d>] __warn+0x107/0x134 [<6008da6c>] ? wake_up_process+0x17/0x19 [<60487628>] ? blk_queue_max_discard_sectors+0x0/0xd [<6006b05f>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0xd1/0xdf [<6006af8e>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x0/0xdf [<600acc14>] ? raw_read_seqcount_begin.constprop.0+0x0/0x15 [<600619ae>] ? os_nsecs+0x1d/0x2b [<604b8d9f>] refcount_warn_saturate+0x13f/0x141 [<6048bc8f>] refcount_sub_and_test.constprop.0+0x2f/0x37 [<6048c8de>] blk_mq_free_request+0xf1/0x10d [<6048ca06>] __blk_mq_end_request+0x10c/0x114 [<6005ac0f>] ubd_intr+0xb5/0x169 [<600a1a37>] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x6b/0x17e [<600a1b70>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x26/0x69 [<600a1bd9>] handle_irq_event+0x26/0x34 [<600a1bb3>] ? handle_irq_event+0x0/0x34 [<600a5186>] ? unmask_irq+0x0/0x37 [<600a57e6>] handle_edge_irq+0xbc/0xd6 [<600a131a>] generic_handle_irq+0x21/0x29 [<60048f6e>] do_IRQ+0x39/0x54 [...] ---[ end trace c6e7444e55386c0f ]--- Cc: Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@collabora.com> Reported-by: Martyn Welch <martyn@collabora.com> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com> Tested-by: Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@collabora.com> Acked-by: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2024
Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module exhibits the following failures: test_bpf: #82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times) test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 301 PASS test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 555 PASS test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 268 PASS test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 269 PASS test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 460 PASS test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 320 PASS test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 222 PASS test_bpf: #320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476 eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported jited:0 273 PASS test_bpf: #344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported jited:0 432 PASS test_bpf: #345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported jited:0 381 PASS test_bpf: #346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported jited:0 505 PASS test_bpf: #490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1 eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported jited:0 261 PASS test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed] Fix them by adding missing processing. Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions") Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/91de862dda99d170697eb79ffb478678af7e0b27.1709652689.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
pull bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 1, 2024
Add a test case to assert that the skb->pkt_type which was set from the BPF program is retained from the netkit xmit side to the peer's device at tcx ingress location. # ./vmtest.sh -- ./test_progs -t netkit [...] ./test_progs -t netkit [ 1.140780] bpf_testmod: loading out-of-tree module taints kernel. [ 1.141127] bpf_testmod: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel [ 1.284601] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 3408.006 MHz [ 1.286672] clocksource: tsc: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x311fd9b189d, max_idle_ns: 440795225691 ns [ 1.290384] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc #345 tc_netkit_basic:OK #346 tc_netkit_device:OK #347 tc_netkit_multi_links:OK #348 tc_netkit_multi_opts:OK #349 tc_netkit_neigh_links:OK #350 tc_netkit_pkt_type:OK Summary: 6/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240524163619.26001-4-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See Commits and Changes for more details.
Created by
pull[bot]
Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )