-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: Documentation and clean up of bevy_input
#3692
Closed
Closed
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bedb48b
Added docs to and refactor of bevy_input.
96e7393
Merge branch 'main' into update_bevy_input_docs
13b16d2
Small changes, added strum and ElementState rename
4072fa7
Fixed doc links.
83b959f
Merge branch 'main' into update_bevy_input_docs
57028b5
ButtonState instead of ElementState
f58ae88
Merge branch 'main' into update_bevy_input_docs
0ee8a80
Merge branch 'main' into update_bevy_input_docs
20c21a6
Remove EnumIter and strum dependency
cd7c811
Merge branch 'main' into update_bevy_input_docs
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
On review, I think this is nicer than the tuple structs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if I like it better than a named struct though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In my eyes tuple structs should be avoided in most cases, because they are a pain to work with. I'm fine with both the named struct and the
new()
constructor. Would probably be a good idea to have a place where we note things like this so we can keep things consistent.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, we have an engine style guide: https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/blob/main/.github/contributing/engine_style_guide.md
@cart, do you have strong feelings?