-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - Rename shapes examples for consistency #6082
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rparrett
added
C-Examples
An addition or correction to our examples
C-Code-Quality
A section of code that is hard to understand or change
labels
Sep 24, 2022
Merging as trivial :) bors r+ |
alice-i-cecile
added
the
S-Ready-For-Final-Review
This PR has been approved by the community. It's ready for a maintainer to consider merging it
label
Sep 24, 2022
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2022
# Objective I was about to submit a PR to add these two examples to `bevy-website` and re-discovered the inconsistency. Although it's not a major issue on the website where only the filenames are shown, this would help to visually distinguish the two examples in the list because the names are very prominent. This also helps out when fuzzy-searching the codebase for these files. ## Solution Rename `shapes` to `2d_shapes`. Now the filename matches the example name, and the naming structure matches the 3d example. ## Notes @Nilirad proposed this in #4613 (comment) but it had slipped away from my brain at that time.
Build failed: |
bors r+ |
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2022
# Objective I was about to submit a PR to add these two examples to `bevy-website` and re-discovered the inconsistency. Although it's not a major issue on the website where only the filenames are shown, this would help to visually distinguish the two examples in the list because the names are very prominent. This also helps out when fuzzy-searching the codebase for these files. ## Solution Rename `shapes` to `2d_shapes`. Now the filename matches the example name, and the naming structure matches the 3d example. ## Notes @Nilirad proposed this in #4613 (comment) but it had slipped away from my brain at that time.
mockersf
approved these changes
Sep 24, 2022
Build failed: |
example name need to be renamed here too: bevy/.github/workflows/validation-jobs.yml Line 150 in e7cd9c1
|
alice-i-cecile
approved these changes
Sep 25, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
bors r+
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 25, 2022
# Objective I was about to submit a PR to add these two examples to `bevy-website` and re-discovered the inconsistency. Although it's not a major issue on the website where only the filenames are shown, this would help to visually distinguish the two examples in the list because the names are very prominent. This also helps out when fuzzy-searching the codebase for these files. ## Solution Rename `shapes` to `2d_shapes`. Now the filename matches the example name, and the naming structure matches the 3d example. ## Notes @Nilirad proposed this in #4613 (comment) but it had slipped away from my brain at that time.
Pull request successfully merged into main. Build succeeded: |
bors
bot
changed the title
Rename shapes examples for consistency
[Merged by Bors] - Rename shapes examples for consistency
Sep 25, 2022
james7132
pushed a commit
to james7132/bevy
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 19, 2022
# Objective I was about to submit a PR to add these two examples to `bevy-website` and re-discovered the inconsistency. Although it's not a major issue on the website where only the filenames are shown, this would help to visually distinguish the two examples in the list because the names are very prominent. This also helps out when fuzzy-searching the codebase for these files. ## Solution Rename `shapes` to `2d_shapes`. Now the filename matches the example name, and the naming structure matches the 3d example. ## Notes @Nilirad proposed this in bevyengine#4613 (comment) but it had slipped away from my brain at that time.
james7132
pushed a commit
to james7132/bevy
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 28, 2022
# Objective I was about to submit a PR to add these two examples to `bevy-website` and re-discovered the inconsistency. Although it's not a major issue on the website where only the filenames are shown, this would help to visually distinguish the two examples in the list because the names are very prominent. This also helps out when fuzzy-searching the codebase for these files. ## Solution Rename `shapes` to `2d_shapes`. Now the filename matches the example name, and the naming structure matches the 3d example. ## Notes @Nilirad proposed this in bevyengine#4613 (comment) but it had slipped away from my brain at that time.
ItsDoot
pushed a commit
to ItsDoot/bevy
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 1, 2023
# Objective I was about to submit a PR to add these two examples to `bevy-website` and re-discovered the inconsistency. Although it's not a major issue on the website where only the filenames are shown, this would help to visually distinguish the two examples in the list because the names are very prominent. This also helps out when fuzzy-searching the codebase for these files. ## Solution Rename `shapes` to `2d_shapes`. Now the filename matches the example name, and the naming structure matches the 3d example. ## Notes @Nilirad proposed this in bevyengine#4613 (comment) but it had slipped away from my brain at that time.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
C-Code-Quality
A section of code that is hard to understand or change
C-Examples
An addition or correction to our examples
S-Ready-For-Final-Review
This PR has been approved by the community. It's ready for a maintainer to consider merging it
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Objective
I was about to submit a PR to add these two examples to
bevy-website
and re-discovered the inconsistency.Although it's not a major issue on the website where only the filenames are shown, this would help to visually distinguish the two examples in the list because the names are very prominent.
This also helps out when fuzzy-searching the codebase for these files.
Solution
Rename
shapes
to2d_shapes
. Now the filename matches the example name, and the naming structure matches the 3d example.Notes
@Nilirad proposed this in #4613 (comment) but it had slipped away from my brain at that time.