Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement reflect trait on new glam types (I64Vec and U64Vec) #9281

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 31, 2023

Conversation

PortalRising
Copy link
Contributor

Objective

Glam 0.24 added new glam types (I64Vec and U64Vec). However these are not reflectable unlike the other glam types

Solution

Implement reflect for these new types


Changelog

Implements reflect with the impl_reflect_struct macro on I64Vec2, I64Vec3, I64Vec4, U64Vec2, U64Vec3, and U64Vec4 types

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome, new contributor!

Please make sure you've read our contributing guide and we look forward to reviewing your pull request shortly ✨

@MrGVSV MrGVSV added A-Reflection Runtime information about types A-Math Fundamental domain-agnostic mathematical operations labels Jul 26, 2023
Copy link
Member

@MrGVSV MrGVSV left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks for adding these!

@mockersf mockersf added the S-Ready-For-Final-Review This PR has been approved by the community. It's ready for a maintainer to consider merging it label Jul 30, 2023
@alice-i-cecile alice-i-cecile added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 31, 2023
Merged via the queue into bevyengine:main with commit f14300e Jul 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-Math Fundamental domain-agnostic mathematical operations A-Reflection Runtime information about types S-Ready-For-Final-Review This PR has been approved by the community. It's ready for a maintainer to consider merging it
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants