Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add Lua burnblow fallback "over range" and "leash" customparams #3918

Open
wants to merge 15 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SethDGamre
Copy link
Collaborator

@SethDGamre SethDGamre commented Nov 10, 2024

the gadget originally intended to fix torpedo bombers has become more about preventing overrange in general. The leash functionality is still there too. Quite performant. First I'd like to add the gadget and then give units the customparam in a separate PR

@SethDGamre SethDGamre added the Awaiting GDT Approval Awaiting approval from the Game Design Team (game mechanics, balance only) label Nov 10, 2024
@SethDGamre SethDGamre removed the Awaiting GDT Approval Awaiting approval from the Game Design Team (game mechanics, balance only) label Nov 23, 2024
@SethDGamre SethDGamre marked this pull request as ready for review November 23, 2024 21:19
@SethDGamre SethDGamre changed the title Fix torpedo planes, add projectile_leash_range customparam add Lua burnblow fallback "over range" and "leash" customparams Nov 24, 2024
@sprunk
Copy link
Collaborator

sprunk commented Nov 24, 2024

why not just adjust flighttime for torpedoes?

@WatchTheFort WatchTheFort marked this pull request as draft November 26, 2024 15:54
@SethDGamre
Copy link
Collaborator Author

why not just adjust flighttime for torpedoes?

doesn't fix the original issue of bonus range from the drop distance of the torpedo. That would cause the torpedo to die before it reaches its target if adjusted for the desired range. It's a pile of poopy.

Gadget's been rewritten to instead take care of unintentional range hax for rockets and starburst missile launchers and whatever else might be wanted. Ready for review.

@SethDGamre SethDGamre marked this pull request as ready for review November 27, 2024 01:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants