Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use maven license plugin to ensure source has correct license #278

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 25, 2014

Conversation

massie
Copy link
Member

@massie massie commented Jun 25, 2014

No description provided.

```
$ mvn org.scalariform:scalariform-maven-plugin:format
$ ./scripts/format-source
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does that have to be run manually, or is it still part of our build process?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Both. We decided against being too magical/automatic. The pull request builder runs it with each pull request to make sure the developer ran it.

@fnothaft
Copy link
Member

I'm concerned about how this will impact our performance; @massie have you benchmarked this change?

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/ADAM-prb/35/

@massie
Copy link
Member Author

massie commented Jun 25, 2014

@fnothaft I have a whole suite of tests written that you can expect in a follow-on pull request. The suite is too extensive and large to include here.

@fnothaft
Copy link
Member

@massie I eagerly await it.

fnothaft added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2014
Use maven license plugin to ensure source has correct license
@fnothaft fnothaft merged commit c95cdc5 into bigdatagenomics:master Jun 25, 2014
@fnothaft
Copy link
Member

Thanks @massie! I look forward to the follow-on tests.

@tdanford
Copy link
Contributor

We are going to spend the next two hundred years trying to recreate the inclusive test-suite Matt alluded to in the margins above.

@massie massie deleted the license branch September 2, 2015 19:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants