Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed: Issue 90 #560

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

jvivian
Copy link
Contributor

@jvivian jvivian commented Jan 27, 2015

  • Removed Required=true from @arguments
  • Supplied control statement in run method to handle -list_comparisons exception

@jvivian jvivian changed the title Issue 90 experiment Fixed: Issue 90 Jan 27, 2015
@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

println("\nAvailable comparisons:")
DefaultComparisons.comparisons.foreach {
generator =>
println("\t%10s : %s".format(generator.name, generator.description))
}

return
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Commenting this return statement out produces an error. What exactly does it do?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It terminate the run() method. Unless the caller has something else to do (which I don't think is the case) it will return also, and so on until the current thread's main run method returns. That will terminate the thread and if it is the last non-daemon thread, the equivalent of sys.exit(0) will be performed, i.e. the JVM process terminates with a zero status code.

@fnothaft
Copy link
Member

Jenkins, add to whitelist and test this please.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/ADAM-prb/565/
Test PASSed.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/ADAM-prb/566/
Test PASSed.

@fnothaft
Copy link
Member

fnothaft commented Feb 5, 2015

@jvivian can you rebase this on master? I would merge but am getting merge conflicts.

@fnothaft
Copy link
Member

fnothaft commented Feb 5, 2015

Also, can you squash these commits down to a single commit?

@jvivian
Copy link
Contributor Author

jvivian commented Feb 5, 2015

Should I close this request and open another? I've committed the changes to the master branch (as one commit).

@fnothaft
Copy link
Member

fnothaft commented Feb 5, 2015

You should be able to do the squash and rebase on the original branch that the PR is from. If you do that and then push that branch, then you won't need to open a new PR.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/ADAM-prb/584/

Build result: FAILURE

GitHub pull request #560 of commit c0093ad.Notifying endpoint 'HTTP:https://webhooks.gitter.im/e/ac8bb6e9f53357bc8aa8'[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.Building remotely on amp-jenkins-worker-05 (centos) in workspace /home/jenkins/workspace/ADAM-prb > git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree # timeout=10Fetching changes from the remote Git repository > git config remote.origin.url https://github.com/bigdatagenomics/adam.git # timeout=10Fetching upstream changes from https://github.com/bigdatagenomics/adam.git > git --version # timeout=10 > git fetch --tags --progress https://github.com/bigdatagenomics/adam.git +refs/pull/:refs/remotes/origin/pr/ > git rev-parse c0093ad^{commit} # timeout=10Checking out Revision c0093ad (detached) > git config core.sparsecheckout # timeout=10 > git checkout -f c0093ad > git rev-list d8e02d9 # timeout=10Triggering ADAM-prb ? 2.2.0,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 1.0.4,centosADAM-prb ? 2.2.0,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 1.0.4,centos completed with result FAILURENotifying endpoint 'HTTP:https://webhooks.gitter.im/e/ac8bb6e9f53357bc8aa8'
Test FAILed.

@fnothaft
Copy link
Member

fnothaft commented Feb 5, 2015

Jenkins, retest this please.

@jvivian
Copy link
Contributor Author

jvivian commented Feb 5, 2015

Sorry Frank, I'm in the meeting Matt is in -- I'll squash and rebase ASAP.

@fnothaft
Copy link
Member

fnothaft commented Feb 5, 2015

@jvivian no worries! Take your time.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/ADAM-prb/585/

Build result: ABORTED

GitHub pull request #560 of commit c0093ad.Notifying endpoint 'HTTP:https://webhooks.gitter.im/e/ac8bb6e9f53357bc8aa8'[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.Building remotely on amp-jenkins-worker-05 (centos) in workspace /home/jenkins/workspace/ADAM-prb > git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree # timeout=10Fetching changes from the remote Git repository > git config remote.origin.url https://github.com/bigdatagenomics/adam.git # timeout=10Fetching upstream changes from https://github.com/bigdatagenomics/adam.git > git --version # timeout=10 > git fetch --tags --progress https://github.com/bigdatagenomics/adam.git +refs/pull/:refs/remotes/origin/pr/ > git rev-parse c0093ad^{commit} # timeout=10Checking out Revision c0093ad (detached) > git config core.sparsecheckout # timeout=10 > git checkout -f c0093ad > git rev-list c0093ad # timeout=10Triggering ADAM-prb ? 2.2.0,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 1.0.4,centosADAM-prb ? 2.2.0,centos completed with result ABORTEDADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,centos completed with result SUCCESSADAM-prb ? 1.0.4,centos completed with result FAILURENotifying endpoint 'HTTP:https://webhooks.gitter.im/e/ac8bb6e9f53357bc8aa8'
Test FAILed.

…nomics#90)

Added control flow in CompareADAM.scala to return options for -list_arguments flag when no arguments (files) are provided.
@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/ADAM-prb/587/

Build result: FAILURE

GitHub pull request #560 of commit e4f3520 automatically merged.Notifying endpoint 'HTTP:https://webhooks.gitter.im/e/ac8bb6e9f53357bc8aa8'[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.Building remotely on amp-jenkins-worker-05 (centos) in workspace /home/jenkins/workspace/ADAM-prb > git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree # timeout=10Fetching changes from the remote Git repository > git config remote.origin.url https://github.com/bigdatagenomics/adam.git # timeout=10Fetching upstream changes from https://github.com/bigdatagenomics/adam.git > git --version # timeout=10 > git fetch --tags --progress https://github.com/bigdatagenomics/adam.git +refs/pull/:refs/remotes/origin/pr/ > git rev-parse origin/pr/560/merge^{commit} # timeout=10Checking out Revision 66bb29e (detached) > git config core.sparsecheckout # timeout=10 > git checkout -f 66bb29e > git rev-list c0093ad # timeout=10Triggering ADAM-prb ? 2.2.0,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,centosTriggering ADAM-prb ? 1.0.4,centosADAM-prb ? 2.2.0,centos completed with result FAILUREADAM-prb ? 2.3.0,centos completed with result FAILUREADAM-prb ? 1.0.4,centos completed with result FAILURENotifying endpoint 'HTTP:https://webhooks.gitter.im/e/ac8bb6e9f53357bc8aa8'
Test FAILed.

@jvivian
Copy link
Contributor Author

jvivian commented Feb 6, 2015

I rebased and squashed, but I had to force push. Given that my previous commits were built successfully, I'm not sure the current build failure is due to my commits.

@fnothaft
Copy link
Member

fnothaft commented Feb 6, 2015

@jvivian this isn't an issue on your side; there's a known bug in our CI system that causes the system to intermittently fail to correctly check out a fork after a force push. We just try rerunning the tests until the CI system checks out the fork and builds correctly.

@fnothaft
Copy link
Member

fnothaft commented Feb 6, 2015

Jenkins, retest this please.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/ADAM-prb/588/
Test PASSed.

@fnothaft
Copy link
Member

fnothaft commented Feb 6, 2015

Thanks @jvivian! I've manually committed this via 1956ac9.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants