Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update versionix to 0.99.0 #51204

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 7, 2024
Merged

Update versionix to 0.99.0 #51204

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 7, 2024

Conversation

BiocondaBot
Copy link
Collaborator

Update versionix: 0.3.00.99.0

install with bioconda Conda

Info Link or Description
Recipe recipes/versionix (click to view/edit other files)
Summary Get version of any tools.
Home https://github.com/sequana/versionix
Releases https://pypi.org/pypi/versionix/json

This pull request was automatically generated (see docs).

@BiocondaBot BiocondaBot added autobump Automatic Version Update new version labels Oct 7, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 7, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the meta.yaml file for the versionix package. The primary changes include updating the version number from 0.3.0 to 0.99.0 and altering the SHA256 checksum from 4db636ae61bd6371bf7aeb1b35bedcfa2b16079c64ed18e7e6a58fd096127a3d to 3cef65bb22ae81987024f457e0349e606e2c103b8c3173b0eebca1def63d46d3. No other elements of the file, such as package metadata, requirements, or test commands, have been changed. This update reflects a significant version increment while ensuring the integrity of the package through the updated checksum.

Possibly related PRs

  • Update versionix to 0.3.0 #51127: This PR updates the versionix package's version from 0.2.4 to 0.3.0 and modifies the SHA256 checksum, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR that updates the version from 0.3.0 to 0.99.0 and changes the SHA256 checksum accordingly.

Suggested reviewers

  • rpetit3

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1bc7f1b and c11c80b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • recipes/versionix/meta.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
recipes/versionix/meta.yaml (2)

Line range hint 1-45: Verify dependencies and run_exports pinning.

Given the significant version jump from 0.3.0 to 0.99.0, it's worth considering the following:

  1. Dependencies: Verify if any of the package dependencies (python, click, rich-click, colorlog) need updates to support the new version.
  2. run_exports pinning: The current pinning strategy ({{ pin_subpackage('versionix', max_pin="x") }}) allows for minor version updates. Consider if this is still appropriate for the 0.99.0 version, which might be a pre-release for 1.0.0.

To check for any changes in dependencies, you can compare the pyproject.toml or setup.py files between the old and new versions:

✅ Verification successful

Dependencies and run_exports pinning verified.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare dependency specifications between versions

# Set variables
OLD_VERSION="0.3.0"
NEW_VERSION="0.99.0"

# Test: Download both versions and compare their dependency specifications
for version in $OLD_VERSION $NEW_VERSION; do
  curl -sL "https://pypi.io/packages/source/v/versionix/versionix-${version}.tar.gz" | tar -xz -C /tmp
  echo "Dependencies for version ${version}:"
  grep -A 10 "dependencies" /tmp/versionix-${version}/pyproject.toml || echo "No pyproject.toml found"
  grep -A 10 "install_requires" /tmp/versionix-${version}/setup.py || echo "No setup.py found"
  echo "---"
done

Length of output: 1580

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)


10-10: SHA256 checksum updated, verify its correctness.

The SHA256 checksum has been updated, which is expected when changing the package version. This change helps maintain the integrity of the package.

To ensure the new checksum is correct, please verify it against the official source. You can use the following script to download the package and calculate its checksum:

@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
{% set name = "versionix" %}
{% set version = "0.3.0" %}
{% set version = "0.99.0" %}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Missing CHANGELOG file for version update.

A CHANGELOG file was not found in the repository. It's essential to include a changelog or release notes to document the changes associated with version 0.99.0. Please add a CHANGELOG to ensure clarity and maintain proper documentation for this significant version jump.

🔗 Analysis chain

Version update looks good, but verify changelog.

The version update from 0.3.0 to 0.99.0 is consistent with the PR objectives. This significant version jump likely indicates major changes in the package.

To ensure the update is justified, please verify the package's changelog or release notes. You can use the following script to check for a CHANGELOG file in the repository:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for the existence of a CHANGELOG file in the versionix repository

# Test: Search for CHANGELOG file
gh repo view sequana/versionix --json files --jq '.files[] | select(.name | test("(?i)changelog"))' || echo "No CHANGELOG file found. Please manually verify the changes for version 0.99.0."

Length of output: 1580

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
autobump Automatic Version Update new version
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants