Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update versionix to 0.99.1 #51297

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2024
Merged

Update versionix to 0.99.1 #51297

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2024

Conversation

BiocondaBot
Copy link
Collaborator

Update versionix: 0.99.00.99.1

install with bioconda Conda

Info Link or Description
Recipe recipes/versionix (click to view/edit other files)
Summary Get version of any tools.
Home https://github.com/sequana/versionix
Releases https://pypi.org/pypi/versionix/json

This pull request was automatically generated (see docs).

@BiocondaBot BiocondaBot added autobump Automatic Version Update new version labels Oct 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 10, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request modifies the meta.yaml file for the versionix package. The primary change is the update of the version number from 0.99.0 to 0.99.1. Alongside this version increment, the SHA256 checksum for the source tarball has been updated to reflect the new version, changing from 3cef65bb22ae81987024f457e0349e606e2c103b8c3173b0eebca1def63d46d3 to 022f28a65406b34160c1ad27c543ac0167f0bcacb960dcb9ca00bc588a425304. No other modifications were made to the file structure, including the package metadata, requirements, or build instructions, which remain unchanged.

Possibly related PRs

  • Update versionix to 0.99.0 #51204: Updates the versionix package's version from 0.3.0 to 0.99.0 and modifies the SHA256 checksum, directly related to the current PR's version update from 0.99.0 to 0.99.1.
  • Update versionix to 0.3.0 #51127: Updates the versionix package from 0.2.4 to 0.3.0, indicating a sequence of version updates for the same package and file.

Suggested reviewers

  • martin-g

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
recipes/versionix/meta.yaml (1)

Line range hint 1-47: Overall changes look good with a minor suggestion.

The version update and SHA256 checksum change are the only modifications, which is correct for this type of update. The rest of the recipe remains unchanged, which is appropriate as there are no version-specific dependencies or build instructions.

As a minor improvement, consider adding a doc_url field in the about section pointing to the project's documentation, if available. This can help users find additional information about the package.

You could add the following line in the about section:

  doc_url: https://github.com/sequana/versionix/blob/main/README.rst
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a489320 and 36677cc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • recipes/versionix/meta.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
recipes/versionix/meta.yaml (2)

2-2: Version update looks correct.

The version has been updated from 0.99.0 to 0.99.1, which aligns with the PR objectives.


10-10: Verify the SHA256 checksum.

The SHA256 checksum has been updated. Let's verify its correctness.

@martin-g martin-g merged commit 85b3d91 into master Oct 10, 2024
7 checks passed
@martin-g martin-g deleted the bump/versionix branch October 10, 2024 11:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
autobump Automatic Version Update new version
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants