You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
produce an output file with the following header:
"SEMMEDDB_Subject", "SEMMEDDB_Predicate", "SEMMEDDB_Object", "BiolinkSubject", "BiolinkPredicate", "BiolinkObject", "Valid_Edge?", "Component Missing"
The mapping for subject, predicate, object in Biolink should be made independently, with a second check for whether this combination is a valid edge in biolink.
Biolink edge is valid when the code can find valid biolink classes for subject and object and a valid biolink association slot (which is also a child of related_to, aka: a biolink predicate), for the predicate, AND the domain and range constraints on the biolink predicate encompass the passed subject and object respectively.
for the first row - the output is saying this isn't a valid Biolink edge because there is no mapping in Biolink for STY:Txxx humn (I imagine this is "human").
we're saying that we can match everything in the row (there are no missing components), but its not a valid edge in biolink. For the treats predicate, the domain and range are as follows:
domain: chemical or drug or treatment
range: disease or phenotypic feature
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Using the files: https://lhncbc.nlm.nih.gov/ii/tools/MetaMap/documentation/SemanticTypesAndGroups.html
and
https://files.slack.com/files-pri/TSCGQ3XGB-F054B54G9TP/download/semmedver43_2023_r_predication.116080.metaedges.txt?origin_team=TSCGQ3XGB
produce an output file with the following header:
"SEMMEDDB_Subject", "SEMMEDDB_Predicate", "SEMMEDDB_Object", "BiolinkSubject", "BiolinkPredicate", "BiolinkObject", "Valid_Edge?", "Component Missing"
The mapping for subject, predicate, object in Biolink should be made independently, with a second check for whether this combination is a valid edge in biolink.
Biolink edge is valid when the code can find valid biolink classes for subject and object and a valid biolink association slot (which is also a child of related_to, aka: a biolink predicate), for the predicate, AND the domain and range constraints on the biolink predicate encompass the passed subject and object respectively.
For example:
for the first row - the output is saying this isn't a valid Biolink edge because there is no mapping in Biolink for STY:Txxx humn (I imagine this is "human").
for this row:
we're saying that we can match everything in the row (there are no missing components), but its not a valid edge in biolink. For the treats predicate, the domain and range are as follows:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: