Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add adapater functions for delayStart and jitterStart in child workflow #6201

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 30, 2024

Conversation

timl3136
Copy link
Member

What changed?
We recently uncovered missing adapter functions for delay start and jitter start in StartChildWorkflowExecutionInitiatedEventAttributes

Why?
Currently delaystart and jitterstart features are not working in child workflow partly due to this reason.

How did you test it?
Unit tests

Potential risks

Release notes

Documentation Changes

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 72.91%. Comparing base (f3350d0) to head (8b047f2).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
Files Coverage Δ
common/types/mapper/thrift/shared.go 97.71% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

... and 7 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f3350d0...8b047f2. Read the comment docs.

@timl3136 timl3136 enabled auto-merge (squash) July 30, 2024 19:07
@timl3136 timl3136 disabled auto-merge July 30, 2024 19:08
@timl3136 timl3136 enabled auto-merge (squash) July 30, 2024 19:08
Comment on lines +5215 to +5216
DelayStartSeconds: t.DelayStartSeconds,
JitterStartSeconds: t.JitterStartSeconds,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks for fixing this.

@timl3136 timl3136 merged commit 58cbab3 into cadence-workflow:master Jul 30, 2024
20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants