Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Have TeamCityDisposableExtensions extend ITeamCityProvider #762

Closed
RichiCoder1 opened this issue Mar 16, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

Have TeamCityDisposableExtensions extend ITeamCityProvider #762

RichiCoder1 opened this issue Mar 16, 2016 · 1 comment
Labels
Improvement
Milestone
v0.11.0

Comments

@RichiCoder1
Copy link
Contributor

See title. Currently TeamCityDisposableExtensions extends TeamCityProvider and therefore aren't accessible by default.
RichiCoder1 pushed a commit to RichiCoder1/cake that referenced this issue Mar 16, 2016
(cake-buildGH-762) Fix TeamCity Disposable
ff63464 
Currently TeamCityDisposableExtensions extends TeamCityProvider and
therefore aren't accessible by default. Switched to extend
ITeamCityProvider. Also now returns IDisposable.
@gep13 gep13 mentioned this issue Mar 16, 2016
Merged
RichiCoder1 pushed a commit to RichiCoder1/cake that referenced this issue Mar 18, 2016
(cake-buildGH-762) Fix TeamCity Disposable
dac7bbf 
Currently TeamCityDisposableExtensions extends TeamCityProvider and
therefore aren't accessible by default. Switched to extend
ITeamCityProvider. Also now returns IDisposable.
devlead added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 18, 2016
@devlead
Merge pull request #763 from RichiCoder1/feature/GH-762_Fix_TeamCity_…
93f7eda 
…Disposable

(GH-762) Fix TeamCity Disposable
@patriksvensson patriksvensson modified the milestone: v0.11.0 Mar 24, 2016
@patriksvensson
Copy link
Member

Closed via #763.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Improvement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v0.11.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@patriksvensson @RichiCoder1