Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Missing import for styles. #129

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 10, 2017
Merged

fix: Missing import for styles. #129

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 10, 2017

Conversation

wojteg1337
Copy link
Contributor

In latest release there is missing import for styles.

Summary

Added missing import

@wojteg1337 wojteg1337 changed the title Missing import for styles. fix: Missing import for styles. Oct 10, 2017
@zamotany
Copy link
Contributor

You need to add yourself to README.md:

  • update contributors badge
  • add new entry to all contributors section with yourself

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 10, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #129 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #129   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.73%   97.73%           
=======================================
  Files          19       19           
  Lines         398      398           
  Branches       74       74           
=======================================
  Hits          389      389           
  Misses          9        9

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c1d5fda...7574042. Read the comment docs.

@zamotany zamotany merged commit d1af1c1 into master Oct 10, 2017
@zamotany zamotany deleted the styles-no-import branch October 10, 2017 15:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants