Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bump juju in all gh workflows #862

Closed
DnPlas opened this issue Apr 9, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

bump juju in all gh workflows #862

DnPlas opened this issue Apr 9, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@DnPlas
Copy link
Contributor

DnPlas commented Apr 9, 2024

Context

To support juju 3.4, we need to bump the channel that is used for installing juju in the integration testing environment of all our repositories.

Optional: bump the versions of ops, pytest-operator and python-libjuju if it is necessary for the tests to pass.

What needs to get done

Do a cannon run that replaces juju-channel: 3.1 with juju-channel: 3.4 in all the repositories maintained by the CKF team. This has to be done in both main and track/<version> (only the corresponding version to CKF 1.8) branches.

Definition of Done

The CI for integration tests runs with juju 3.4.

@DnPlas DnPlas added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 9, 2024
Copy link

Thank you for reporting us your feedback!

The internal ticket has been created: https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/KF-5535.

This message was autogenerated

This was referenced Apr 9, 2024
DnPlas added a commit to canonical/admission-webhook-operator that referenced this issue Apr 9, 2024
DnPlas added a commit to canonical/kubeflow-volumes-operator that referenced this issue Apr 11, 2024
…ts files

Bumping juju and ops packages to use them in newer versions of the charms,
plus testing them in a CI with a more recent juju version.

Part of canonical/bundle-kubeflow#859
Part of canonical/bundle-kubeflow#862
DnPlas added a commit to canonical/kubeflow-volumes-operator that referenced this issue Apr 11, 2024
Bumping juju and ops packages to use them in newer versions of the charms,
plus testing them in a CI with a more recent juju version.

Part of canonical/bundle-kubeflow#859
Part of canonical/bundle-kubeflow#862
DnPlas added a commit to canonical/oidc-gatekeeper-operator that referenced this issue Apr 11, 2024
…arms, plus testing them in a CI with a more recent juju version.

Part of canonical/bundle-kubeflow#859
Part of canonical/bundle-kubeflow#862
@orfeas-k
Copy link
Contributor

orfeas-k commented Apr 11, 2024

Need to send PRs also for

I 'll try to do it in the coming days.

EDIT: We probably don't need to do for EKS since we first need to tackle #801, since at the moment it runs tests only for 1.7. When tackling the referenced issue, we 'll also use the proper juju version, so no need to do sth right now.

ca-scribner added a commit to canonical/oidc-gatekeeper-operator that referenced this issue May 8, 2024
ca-scribner added a commit to canonical/oidc-gatekeeper-operator that referenced this issue May 8, 2024
NohaIhab pushed a commit to canonical/oidc-gatekeeper-operator that referenced this issue May 9, 2024
ca-scribner added a commit to canonical/oidc-gatekeeper-operator that referenced this issue May 9, 2024
NohaIhab pushed a commit to canonical/kfp-operators that referenced this issue May 9, 2024
@DnPlas
Copy link
Contributor Author

DnPlas commented Jun 7, 2024

This work was completed in several PRs, all CIs should now be running with juju 3.5. Closing.

@DnPlas DnPlas closed this as completed Jun 7, 2024
NohaIhab pushed a commit to canonical/kserve-operators that referenced this issue Jul 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants