Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tests: no need to run spread when there are not tests matching the filter #14728

Conversation

sergiocazzolato
Copy link
Collaborator

This change is needed to avoid error in the ci when spread doesn't find any test to run with the provided filter.

…lter

This change is needed to avoid error in the ci when spread doesn't find
any test to run with the provided filter.
@sergiocazzolato sergiocazzolato added the Simple 😃 A small PR which can be reviewed quickly label Nov 15, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.03%. Comparing base (96ea7b0) to head (93ee0c3).
Report is 74 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #14728      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   78.95%   79.03%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files        1084     1087       +3     
  Lines      146638   147628     +990     
==========================================
+ Hits       115773   116672     +899     
- Misses      23667    23728      +61     
- Partials     7198     7228      +30     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 79.03% <ø> (+0.07%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@maykathm maykathm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks

@sergiocazzolato sergiocazzolato merged commit eac2385 into canonical:master Nov 15, 2024
55 of 58 checks passed
@sergiocazzolato sergiocazzolato deleted the tests-fix-nothing-matches-provider-filter branch November 15, 2024 11:30
sespiros added a commit to sespiros/snapd that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2024
* master: (44 commits)
  wrappers: do not reload activation units (canonical#14724)
  gadget/install: support for no{exec,dev,suid} mount flags
  interfaces/builtin/mount_control: add support for nfs mounts (canonical#14694)
  tests: use gojq - part 1 (canonical#14686)
  interfaces/desktop-legacy: allow DBus access to com.canonical.dbusmenu
  interfaces/builtin/fwupd.go: allow access to nvmem for thunderbolt plugin
  tests: removing uc16 executions (canonical#14575)
  tests: Added arm github runner to build snapd (canonical#14504)
  tests: no need to run spread when there are not tests matching the filter (canonical#14728)
  tests/lib/tools/store-state: exit on errors, update relevant tests (canonical#14725)
  tests: udpate the github workflow to run tests suggested by spread-filter tool (canonical#14519)
  testtime: add mockable timers for use in tests (canonical#14672)
  interface/screen_inhibit_control: Improve screen inhibit control for use on core (canonical#14134)
  tests: use images with 20G disk in openstack (canonical#14720)
  i/builtin: allow @ in custom-device filepaths (canonical#14651)
  tests: refactor test-snapd-desktop-layout-with-content
  tests: fix broken app definition
  tests: capitalize sentences in comments
  tests: wrap very long shell line
  tests: fix raciness in async startup and sync install
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Simple 😃 A small PR which can be reviewed quickly
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants